A Verbal Illusion: Now in Three Languages

The so-called depth charge sentences (e.g., no head injury is too trivial to be ignored) were investigated in a comprehension experiment measuring both whether participants understood the stimuli and how certain they were of their interpretation. The experiment revealed that three factors influence the difficulty of depth charge type sentences: the number of negations, the plausibility of the relation between the subject and the verb, and finally the logic of the relation between the adjective and the verb. When a sentence is maximally complex (i.e., when there are multiple negations, the relation between subject and verb is implausible, and the relation between adjective and verb is illogical) participants misunderstood the sentence, but were at the same time certain of their answers. The experiment supports the idea that depth charge sentences create a verbal illusion—the sentences mean one thing, but people systematically understand them to mean the opposite.

[1]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[2]  Andreas Trotzke,et al.  Third Factors and the Performance Interface in Language Design , 2013, Biolinguistics.

[3]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[4]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. , 1975 .

[5]  P C Wason,et al.  A Verbal Illusion , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Jeffrey T. Runner.  Experiments at the Interfaces , 2011 .

[7]  Peter beim Graben,et al.  Diagnosis and repair of negative polarity constructions in the light of symbolic resonance analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[8]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Mental operations in the comparison of sentences and pictures. , 1972 .

[9]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen.  Syntactic reconstruction and reanalysis, semantic dead ends, and prefrontal cortex , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Shallow Processing and Underspecification , 2006 .

[11]  Michael P. Jordan,et al.  The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance , 1998 .

[12]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Mikkel Wallentin,et al.  The locative alternation: Distinguishing linguistic processing cost from error signals in Broca's region , 2011, NeuroImage.

[14]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[15]  William F. Eddy,et al.  Time Course of fMRI-Activation in Language and Spatial Networks during Sentence Comprehension , 1999, NeuroImage.

[16]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen.  Negative and affirmative sentences increase activation in different areas in the brain , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[17]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen,et al.  Structure before Meaning: Sentence Processing, Plausibility, and Subcategorization , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[20]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[21]  D. Natsopoulos,et al.  A verbal illusion in two languages , 1985 .

[22]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Processing polarity items: Contrastive licensing costs , 2004, Brain and Language.

[23]  Colin Phillips,et al.  5: Grammatical Illusions and Selective Fallibility in Real-Time Language Comprehension , 2011 .

[24]  K Christianson,et al.  Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[25]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[26]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Walter Krämer,et al.  Review of Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. by W.N. Venables and B.D. Ripley. Springer-Verlag 2002 , 2003 .

[28]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  An fMRI Study of Bilingual Sentence Comprehension and Workload , 2002, NeuroImage.

[29]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Does understanding negation entail affirmation?: An examination of negated metaphors , 2006 .

[30]  Mark A. Sherman,et al.  Adjectival Negation and the Comprehension of Multiply Negated Sentences. , 1976 .

[31]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? , 2006 .

[32]  G. Bower,et al.  Cognition in learning and memory , 1974 .

[33]  Bradley L. Pritchett.  Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .