A New DST-Belief Theoretic Project Selection Model for Multi-Criteria Decision Support System

Decision-making problem is co-related to quality and availability of the information. Innovative algorithms are proposed as a mathematical problem-solving technique to work in uncertainty-based decision science domain. Evidence-based theory of Dempster-Shafer (DST) is an effective mathematical tool to deal with uncertainty in the decision-making procedure. The current research exposition on new decision-making method based on DST of evidence, quantification evidence preference from different multiple criteria defined by belief function has been presented. They have developed a new framework that tackles the challenges and borne out of uncertainty both in criteria and in alternative levels. The proposed hybridized MCDM tool developed upon fuzzy domain uses plausibility and theory of belief function to construct decision on uncertain and imprecise information. The proposed method can be well fitted for real-life application. An illustrative example establishes the effectiveness of the aforesaid method.

[1]  Santoso Wibowo,et al.  Intelligent Decision Support for Evaluating and Selecting Information Systems Projects , 2008, Eng. Lett..

[2]  Bijan Sarkar,et al.  MCA Based Performance Evaluation of Project Selection , 2011, ArXiv.

[3]  Wei-Kang Wang,et al.  A hybrid knowledge-based decision support system for enterprise mergers and acquisitions , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[5]  Peng Gao,et al.  A hybrid decision support system for sustainable office building renovation and energy performance improvement , 2010 .

[6]  B. Sarkar,et al.  A Soft- Computing Approach for Multi Criteria Project Selection Problem with Grey Number , 2005 .

[7]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[8]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[9]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[10]  Pekka Salminen,et al.  Locating a Waste Treatment Facility by Multicriteria Analysis , 1997 .

[11]  Norman P. Archer,et al.  Project portfolio selection through decision support , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  V V Kolbin DECISION MAKING UNDER INCOMPLETE INFORMATION , 2003 .

[14]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  Recruitment and selection processes through an effective GDSS , 2005 .

[15]  José-Tomás San-José Lombera,et al.  A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings , 2010 .

[16]  Jesús Cuadrado Rojo,et al.  Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability , 2010 .

[17]  Hsu Chen-Yi,et al.  FMCDM with Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach for Customers' Choice Behavior Model , 2007 .

[18]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Review of Uncertainty Reasoning Approaches as Guidance for Maritime and Offshore Safety-Based Assessment , 2002 .

[19]  Sarfraz A. Mian,et al.  Decision-Making over the Project Life Cycle: An Analytical Hierarchy Approach , 1999 .

[20]  N. Pal,et al.  QUANTIFICATION OF CONFLICT IN DEMPSTER-SHAFER FRAMEWORK: A NEW APPROACH , 1996 .

[21]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[22]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Project Management: A Managerial Approach , 1989 .

[23]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Application of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory to unsupervised classification in multisource remote sensing , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  An integrated framework for project portfolio selection , 1999 .

[25]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Feasibility Analysis of Cross-Country Petroleum Pipeline Projects: A Quantitative Approach , 2001 .

[26]  M. Enea,et al.  Fuzzy approach to the environmental impact evaluation , 2001 .

[27]  Bijan Sarkar,et al.  MCDM Based Project Selection by F-AHP & VIKOR , 2011, SEMCCO.

[28]  Richard W. Jones,et al.  A framework for intelligent medical diagnosis using the theory of evidence , 2002, Knowl. Based Syst..

[29]  Wuben Ben Luo,et al.  Using Dempster–Shafer Theory to Represent Climate Change Uncertainties , 1997 .

[30]  José Palazzo Moreira de Oliveira,et al.  Autonomic computing approach for resource allocation , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  N. Danila Strategic evaluation and selection of R&D projects , 1989 .

[32]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  Bijan Sarkar,et al.  A project selection framework of DSS by Dempster-Shafer Theory under fuzziness , 2012, 2012 1st International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT).

[34]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  A Generalization of Bayesian Inference , 1968, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[35]  R Ramanathan,et al.  A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Thierry Denux Reasoning with imprecise belief structures , 1999 .

[37]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  G. Lockett,et al.  Ranking of research projects: Experiments with two methods , 1987 .

[39]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[40]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[41]  Yeh-Liang Hsu,et al.  A decision support system for project portfolio selection , 1996 .

[42]  M. Beynon,et al.  The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling , 2000 .

[43]  A. Mehrez,et al.  An Interactive Approach for Project Selection , 1983 .

[44]  B. Williams,et al.  Operations management. , 2001, Optometry.

[45]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[46]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A comparison of neural network, evidential reasoning and multiple regression analysis in modelling bridge risks , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[47]  Alexander Shpak,et al.  Working Out R&D Programs via Multicriteria Analysis , 1996, Comput. Sci. J. Moldova.

[48]  Hepu Deng,et al.  Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[49]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Hierarchical approach to project planning: the case of a petroleum pipeline construction , 1996 .

[50]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance , 2003 .

[51]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Addressing the contractor selection problem using an evidential reasoning approach , 2001 .

[52]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  A zero-one model for project portfolio selection and scheduling , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[53]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Feasibility analysis of cross-country pipeline projects:a quantitative approach , 2001 .