Management as Negotiation at the Interface: Moving Beyond the Critical—Practice Impasse

The seemingly marginal contribution of management theory to management practice has been commented on in different contexts. Specifically, critical management studies (CMS) seems suspended in an impasse between the aim to critique dominant management practice and discourse, and the expectation to facilitate transformative management action. This paper argues that the theory—practice impasse may, in part, be a result of reductivist perspectives discursively produced by both mainstream and critical management studies. To illustrate this argument, the paper refers to a case study exploring middle management practice in the higher education context. It demonstrates that academic middle management practice as constructed by polarized and polarizing discourses of either managerial or critical orientation is counterproductive to a full understanding of this practice and the contribution it can make to organizations if properly understood, and proposes an alternative reading aimed to `cross the divide' between discourses and between theory and practice. It is proposed that a more constructive engagement with multiple rationalities can move towards a more comprehensive understanding of currently marginalized management activity, and, from there, towards a more productive link between theory and practice.

[1]  T. Pollock,et al.  A Grammar of Motives. , 1945 .

[2]  D. P. Gaver,et al.  Models and Modelling for Manpower Planning , 1966 .

[3]  T. Wilson.  The proletarianisation of academic labour , 1991 .

[4]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[5]  D. Rutherford.  Appraisal in action: A case study of innovation and leadership , 1992 .

[6]  A. H. Halsey,et al.  Decline of Donnish Dominion: The British Academic Professions in the Twentieth Century , 1992 .

[7]  J. A. Kennerley.  Managing Professionals and Professional Autonomy , 1992 .

[8]  Barbara Townley,et al.  PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND THE EMERGENCE OF MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[9]  M. Trow.  Managerialism and the Academic Profession: The Case of England , 1994 .

[10]  P. Ainley.  Degrees of Difference: Higher Education in the 1990s , 1994 .

[11]  David D Denton,et al.  A Time for New Practices , 1994 .

[12]  Higher education 2005: pointers, possibilities, pitfalls, principles , 1995 .

[13]  Martin Parker,et al.  The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity , 1995 .

[14]  Rob White,et al.  Operationalizing the postmodernity construct for efficient organizational change management , 1995 .

[15]  Michael Gregory,et al.  Developing effective college leadership for the management of educational change , 1996 .

[16]  Peter Ford,et al.  Managing change in higher education : a learning environment architecture , 1996 .

[17]  New leader, new culture, “old” university , 1996 .

[18]  Robert Hahn.  Demystifying the Presidency. , 1996 .

[19]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Just How Managed is the McUniversity? Craig Prichard, Hugh Willmott , 1997 .

[20]  J. Rowley.  Academic leaders: made or born? , 1997 .

[21]  Tom Selwyn,et al.  The Marketisation of Higher Education: Management, Discourse and the Politics of Performance , 1998 .

[22]  J. Barry,et al.  On whether it is better to be loved than feared : managerialism and women in universities , 1998 .

[23]  J. Dearlove.  The deadly dull issue of university “administration”? good governance, managerialism and organising academic work , 1998 .

[24]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Academics Responding to Change: New Higher Education Frameworks and Academic Cultures , 1998 .

[25]  Richard S. Bolan,et al.  Rationality revisited: An alternative perspective on reason in management and planning , 1999 .

[26]  N. Jackson,et al.  Rethinking Organisational Behaviour , 1999 .

[27]  M. Jackson.  The role of the head of department in managing performance in UK universities , 1999 .

[28]  P. Taylor,et al.  Making Sense of Academic Life: Academics, Universities, and Change , 1999 .

[29]  B. Townley.  Practical Reason and Performance Appraisal , 1999 .

[30]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity , 1999 .

[31]  Rafael Alcadipani,et al.  Making sense of management: a critical introduction , 1999 .

[32]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia.  Discourse Analysis Organizational Analysis , 2000 .

[33]  Craig Prichard,et al.  Making Managers in Universities and Colleges , 2000 .

[34]  R. Doost.  Tenure and beyond: search for meaning , 2000 .

[35]  Adrian Carr,et al.  Critical theory and the management of change in organizations , 2000 .

[36]  V. Fournier,et al.  At the Critical Moment: Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies , 2000 .

[37]  K. Gergen.  Social Construction In Context , 2001 .

[38]  Paul R. Trowler,et al.  Departmental Leadership in Higher Education , 2001 .

[39]  Ann Taket,et al.  Doing Critical Management Research , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[40]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Captured by the Discourse? The Socially Constitutive Power of New Higher Education Discourse in the UK , 2001 .

[41]  Robyn Thomas,et al.  Managerialism and Accountability in Higher Education: the Gendered Nature of Restructuring and the Costs to Academic Service , 2002 .

[42]  Barbara Townley,et al.  The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change , 2002 .

[43]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Spinning Disciplines: Critical Management Studies in the Context of the Transformation of Management Education , 2002 .

[44]  D. Longbottom,et al.  The need for education and training in the use of the EFQM model for quality management in UK higher education institutions , 2002 .

[45]  Heinz-Dieter Meyer,et al.  The new managerialism in education management: corporatization or organizational learning? , 2002 .

[46]  D. Rowley,et al.  The special challenges of academic leadership , 2003 .

[47]  Mike Cook.  Changing academic work: developing the learning university , 2003 .

[48]  C. Casey.  Contested rationalities, contested organizations , 2004 .