Behavioural factors in accidents at road junctions: the use of a genetic algorithm to extract descriptive rules from police case files.

In-depth studies of behavioural factors in road accidents using conventional methods are often inconclusive and costly. To explore an alternative approach, 200 cross-flow junction road accidents were sampled from the files of Nottinghamshire Constabulary, England, coded for computer analysis using a specially devised 'Traffic Related Action Analysis Language', and then examined using a genetic algorithm (or 'rule-finder' program). For comparison, the same analyses were carried out on 100 descriptions of safe turns, and 100 of hypothetical accident descriptions provided by experienced drivers. A number of findings emerged, distinguishing between accidents turning onto and off major roads; those of younger and older drivers; those that resulted in injury or in damage only; and so on. The study suggests that multiple case-studies based on police case files could be very promising, provided homogeneous samples of accidents are used. Genetic algorithms could play a useful role in preliminary assessment, but an 'information bottleneck' remains to be overcome in capturing enough detail from each case for analysis.

[1]  B E Sabey,et al.  AGES OF CAR DRIVERS INVOLVED IN ACCIDENTS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO JUNCTIONS , 1982 .

[2]  Richard Wright,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF PRE-ACCIDENT SEQUENCES , 1995 .

[3]  Roy Rada,et al.  Machine learning - applications in expert systems and information retrieval , 1986, Ellis Horwood series in artificial intelligence.

[4]  D L Massie,et al.  Development of a collision typology for evaluation of collision avoidance strategies. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  P. Verhaegen LIABILITY OF OLDER DRIVERS IN COLLISIONS , 1995 .

[6]  James T. Reason,et al.  Types and tokens in road accident causation , 1990 .

[7]  F P McKenna,et al.  The human factor in driving accidents. An overview of approaches and problems. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[8]  D. Wright Behavioural research in road safety VII , 1998 .

[9]  D. Norman,et al.  New technology and human error , 1989 .

[10]  Liz England,et al.  THE ROLE OF ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION IN ROAD SAFETY , 1981 .

[11]  P F Agran,et al.  A comparison of reported and unreported noncrash events. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  S Stradling,et al.  Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? , 1990, Ergonomics.

[13]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Control and Human Error Mechanisms , 1987 .

[14]  J C Fell A Motor Vehicle Accident Causal System: The Human Element , 1976, Human factors.

[15]  D C Viano,et al.  Involvement of older drivers in multivehicle side-impact crashes. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  E Hauer,et al.  EXTENT AND SOME IMPLICATIONS OF INCOMPLETE ACCIDENT REPORTING , 1988 .

[17]  A S Hakkert,et al.  Accident analysis and conflict behaviour , 1987 .