The Feasibility of Using Electromagnetic Motion Capture System to Measure Primary and Coupled Movements of Cervical Spine

In the latest research, the application of three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system (ETS) for biomechanical and kinesiologic research of cervical spine has been demonstrated. Little information is available regarding coupled movements that accompany the primary movement in vivo. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of quantifying the primary movements of the cervical spine and their corresponding coupled motions in healthy subjects by a three-dimensional ETS. Twenty healthy subjects (10 males and 10 females) participated in the study. Cervical extension, flexion, side bending, rotation in neutral position, and rotation in a position of full cervical flexion were analyzed via ETS. All measurements were performed actively except for rotation in a position of full cervical flexion. According to our results, the high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2, 1)) values (greater than 0.791) suggested that ETS is appropriate for measuring primary movements in the cervical spine. However, the ETS could not be applied for the coupled movements with ICC (2, 1), which varied widely from 0.089 to 0.942. Except for coupled side bending during performance of primary flexion (0.757), coupled extension-flexion during performing primary left-side bending (0.942) and coupled extension-flexion during performing primary rotation to the right (0.863), the ICC (2, 1) values of other coupled movements were below 0.750. The current findings provide the basis for further application of the ETS to evaluate cervical spine kinematics for clients with movement disorders excluding those coupled motions that could not be reliably measured by ETS. Meanwhile, the three-dimensional motion patterns monitored by ETS may provide a diagnostic basis for detecting and characterizing cervical movement dysfunction.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  G. Jull,et al.  Measuring range of active cervical rotation in a position of full head flexion using the 3D Fastrak measurement system: an intra-tester reliability study. , 2003, Manual therapy.

[3]  S. Edmondston,et al.  Influence of cranio-cervical posture on three-dimensional motion of the cervical spine. , 2005, Manual therapy.

[4]  François Lavaste,et al.  3D ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL SPINE KINEMATICS: EFFECT OF AGE AND GENDER IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS , 2008 .

[5]  James D. Kang,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion: reliability of a computer assisted magnetic tracking device compared to inclinometer , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[6]  P. Mortensen EPIDEMIOLOGY , 2012, Schizophrenia Research.

[7]  B F Morrey,et al.  Three‐dimensional kinematics of glenohumeral elevation , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  G. Jull,et al.  Cervical Range of Motion Discriminates Between Asymptomatic Persons and Those With Whiplash , 2001, Spine.

[9]  G. J. Gouw,et al.  Examining motion in the cervical spine. II: Characterization of coupled joint motion using an opto-electronic device to track skin markers. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[10]  P. G. M. B. D. DM-SMed,et al.  Muscle energy concepts and coupled motion of the spine , 1998 .

[11]  O. Vasseljen,et al.  Altered motor control patterns in whiplash and chronic neck pain , 2008, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[12]  C. L. Nash,et al.  Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  V. Feipel,et al.  The use of disharmonic motion curves in problems of the cervical spine , 1999, International Orthopaedics.

[15]  Nathaniel R. Ordway,et al.  Cervical Sagittal Range‐of‐Motion Analysis Using Three Methods: Cervical Range‐of‐Motion Device, 3Space, and Radiography , 1997, Spine.

[16]  Zeevi Dvir,et al.  Cervical motion testing: methodology and clinical implications. , 2008, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[17]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movements of the Upper Cervical Spine , 1988, Spine.

[18]  T. R. Garrett,et al.  Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion--comparison of three methods. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[19]  K. Jordan,et al.  Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement tools. , 2000, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[20]  L Penning,et al.  Rotation of the Cervical Spine: A CT Study in Normal Subjects , 1987, Spine.

[21]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of active cervical motion: the effect of age and gender. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  P. Jones,et al.  The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[23]  Kwan-Hwa Lin,et al.  Measurement of cervical range of motion pattern during cyclic neck movement by an ultrasound-based motion system. , 2005, Manual therapy.

[24]  P. Fransson,et al.  Primary and Coupled Cervical Movements: The Effect of Age, Gender, and Body Mass Index. A 3-Dimensional Movement Analysis of a Population Without Symptoms of Neck Disorders , 2006, Spine.

[25]  T. Hall,et al.  The flexion-rotation test and active cervical mobility--a comparative measurement study in cervicogenic headache. , 2004, Manual therapy.

[26]  D Buch,et al.  Clinical validity and stability of active and passive cervical range of motion with regard to total and unilateral uniplanar motion. , 1999, Spine.

[27]  P Herberts,et al.  Biomechanical model of the human shoulder--I. Elements. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Peter J McNair,et al.  Head and neck position sense in whiplash patients and healthy individuals and the effect of the cranio-cervical flexion action. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[29]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Posture affects motion coupling patterns of the upper cervical spine , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[30]  L. Cocchiarella,et al.  Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment , 2000 .

[31]  V Feipel,et al.  Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  A kinematic method to calculate the workspace of the trapeziometacarpal joint , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[33]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[34]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[35]  K. An,et al.  Kinematics and Contact Characteristics of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[36]  J. Dvořák,et al.  Epidemiology, Physical Examination, and Neurodiagnostics , 1998, Spine.

[37]  J Cholewicki,et al.  Methodological considerations for using inductive sensors (3SPACE ISOTRAK) to monitor 3-D orthopaedic joint motion. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[38]  Yoshinobu Sato,et al.  Kinematics of the Upper Cervical Spine in Rotation: In Vivo Three-Dimensional Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[39]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .

[40]  A L Hof,et al.  Neck mobility measurement by means of the 'Flock of Birds' electromagnetic tracking system. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[41]  K N An,et al.  Application of a magnetic tracking device to kinesiologic studies. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  J. Mehlsen,et al.  A comparison of physical characteristics between patients seeking treatment for neck pain and age-matched healthy people. , 1997, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[43]  Adrian Lindsay Morphett,et al.  The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study. , 2003, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.