Comparative Life Cycle Assessments: Carbon Neutrality and Wood Biomass Energy

Biomass energy is expected to play a major role in the substitution of renewable energy sources for fossil fuels over the next several decades. The US Energy Information Administration (EIA 2012) forecasts increases in the share of biomass in US energy production from 8 percent in 2009 to 15 percent by 2035. The general view has been that carbon emitted into the atmosphere from biological materials is carbon neutral—part of a closed loop whereby plant regrowth simply recaptures the carbon emissions associated with the energy produced. Recently this view has been challenged, and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering regulations to be applied to biomass energy carbon emissions. A basic approach for analyses of environmental impacts has been the use of life cycle assessment (LCA), a methodology for assessing and measuring the environmental impact of a product over its lifetime—from raw material extraction through materials processing, manufacture, distribution, use, repair and maintenance, and disposal or recycling. However, LCA approaches vary, and the results of alternative methodologies often differ (Helin et al. 2012). This study investigates and compares the implications of these alternative approaches for emissions from wood biomass energy, the carbon footprint, and also highlights the differences in LCA environmental impacts.

[1]  S. Sohi Agriculture, forestry and other land use , 2014 .

[2]  Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study , 2022 .

[3]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  L. Sokka,et al.  Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment – a review , 2013 .

[5]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns , 2011 .

[6]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Economic approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  P. Zusman Spatial and temporal price and allocation models , 1971 .

[8]  J. Bowyer,et al.  Managing Forests because Carbon Matters: Integrating Energy, Products, and Land Management Policy , 2011, Journal of Forestry.

[9]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Wood as a Major Feedstock for Biofuel Production in the United States: Impacts on Forests and International Trade , 2013 .

[10]  Xiaohui Tian,et al.  Does wood bioenergy increase carbon stocks in forests , 2012 .

[11]  G. Rebitzera,et al.  Life cycle assessment Part 1 : Framework , goal and scope definition , inventory analysis , and applications , 2004 .

[12]  H. MacLean,et al.  Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[14]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories , 2005 .

[15]  Robert Mendelsohn,et al.  Forest Management, Conservation, and Global Timber Markets , 1999 .

[16]  Maureen E. Puettmann,et al.  LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF WOOD PRODUCTS: CRADLE-TO-GATE LCI OF RESIDENTIAL WOOD BUILDING MATERIALS , 2005 .

[17]  Roger A. Sedjo,et al.  Carbon Neutrality and Bioenergy: A Zero-Sum Game? , 2011 .

[18]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM): Model structure and policy applications. Forest Service research paper , 1996 .

[19]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .

[20]  J. Muth Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements , 1961 .

[21]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .