The effect of low ‐ level laser 810 nm and light ‐ emitting diode photobiomodulation ( 626 nm ) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin ‐ 1 beta and prostaglandin E 2 , around implants

Background: One of the most common problems in edentulous patients is the low stability of lower dentures. The most effective method to overcome this problem is implant‐supported overdentures. After placing an implant, for the process of osseointegration to be complete and successful, it is better that patients do not use their denture for few months. This may be nonconvenient for patient because they are unable to speak and eat properly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low level laser (LLL) and light‐emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation on implant stability as well as their effect on interleukin‐1 beta (IL‐1β) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) biomarkers around implant in lower anterior region (over denture). Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, 36 implants were placed in fully edentulous mandibles (12 people per person ‐ three implants in areas of midline and canine). Each of the implants was randomly placed in one of three groups of laser, LED, and control. LLL (power of 50 mw and the amount of 20 J/cm2 for each implant) and LED with dose (20 mw/cm2) were irradiated on the day of surgery (zero), 3, 7, 10, and 14 days. The stability of implants was measured on the day of surgery and weeks 3, 4, and 8 after surgery with Periotest. The inflammatory biomarkers of IL‐1β and PGE2 were also collected from gingival crevicular fluid around implants in 4 and 8 weeks. The collected data were analyzed by ANOVA statistical tests.pvalue<0.05 considered significant Results: The amounts of Periotest significantly increased 3rd week after surgery in the control group (P < 0.001). However, the laser group and LED group were associated with minimal changes, which indicates lower stability of implant in 3rd week in control group but no changes in stability of test groups (laser and LED). Laser and LED had no effect on the level of IL‐1β and PGE2 in 4 and 8 weeks. Conclusion: The use of LLL or LED has a positive effect on the stability of the implants 3 weeks

[1]  Sara A. Alfadda,et al.  Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic, and Immunologic Inflammatory Parameters around Crestally and Subcrestally Placed Dental Implants: 5‐Year Retrospective Results , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  M. Farhadian,et al.  Low-level laser therapy with 940 nm diode laser on stability of dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial , 2018, Lasers in Medical Science.

[3]  T. Talo Yıldırım,et al.  Associations of alveolar bone loss and interleukin-1β levels in one- and two-stage surgical procedures: a randomized prospective trial , 2017, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[4]  P. Gümüş,et al.  Biomarkers and Bacteria Around Implants and Natural Teeth in the Same Individuals , 2017, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  G. Belibasakis,et al.  Titanium ions form particles that activate and execute interleukin‐1β release from lipopolysaccharide‐primed macrophages , 2016, Journal of periodontal research.

[6]  A. A. Del Bel Cury,et al.  Comparison between inflammation-related markers in peri-implant crevicular fluid and clinical parameters during osseointegration in edentulous jaws , 2017, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[7]  A. Parlar,et al.  Evaluation of peri-implant crevicular fluid prostaglandin E2 levels in augmented extraction sockets by different biomaterials , 2016, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[8]  M. D. de Oliveira,et al.  Peri-implant osseointegration after low-level laser therapy: micro-computed tomography and resonance frequency analysis in an animal model , 2016, Lasers in Medical Science.

[9]  C. Galli,et al.  Role of Prostaglandin E2 in the Modulation of Wnt Canonical Signaling in Cells on Microstructured Titanium Surfaces , 2016, Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials.

[10]  M. Barbara,et al.  Titanium scaffold osteogenesis in healthy and osteoporotic rats is improved by the use of low-level laser therapy (GaAlAs) , 2016, Lasers in Medical Science.

[11]  B. Park,et al.  Low-level laser therapy affects osseointegration in titanium implants: resonance frequency, removal torque, and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits , 2016, Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  L. Carlsson,et al.  Histologic and Resonance Frequency Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Healing After Low-Level Laser Therapy: An In Vivo Study. , 2015, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  Joel M. White,et al.  Periodontal and peri-implant wound healing following laser therapy. , 2015, Periodontology 2000.

[14]  Luciano Mayer,et al.  Histomorphometric assessment of the influence of low-level laser therapy on peri-implant tissue healing in the rabbit mandible. , 2015, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[15]  M. D. de Oliveira,et al.  Low-level laser therapy improves peri-implant bone formation: resonance frequency, electron microscopy, and stereology findings in a rabbit model. , 2015, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[16]  S. Yaghobee,et al.  Assessment of interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 in the crevicular fluid around healthy implants, implants with peri-implantitis, and healthy teeth: a cross-sectional study , 2014, Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  FreddoAngelo Luiz,et al.  Finite element analysis of masticatory stress on neoformed bone tissue after distraction osteogenesis and low-level laser therapy: a pilot study. , 2014 .

[18]  Serenay Elgun,et al.  The effect of light-emitting diode photobiomodulation on implant stability and biochemical markers in peri-implant crevicular fluid. , 2014, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[19]  T. Fukuda,et al.  Low-level laser therapy in IL-1β, COX-2, and PGE2 modulation in partially injured Achilles tendon , 2014, Lasers in Medical Science.

[20]  A. Pinheiro,et al.  New bone formation around implants inserted on autologous and xenografts irradiated or not with IR laser light: a histomorphometric study in rabbits. , 2013, Brazilian dental journal.

[21]  E. Mijiritsky,et al.  Evaluation of Periimplant Crevicular Fluid Prostaglandin E2 and Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Levels From Health to Periimplant Disease Status: A Prospective Study , 2012, Implant dentistry.

[22]  J. Marotti,et al.  Stability of dental implants after irradiation with an 830-nm low-level laser: a double-blind randomized clinical study , 2012, Lasers in Medical Science.

[23]  F. França,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of the influence of low-level laser therapy in secondary stability of implants in mice shinbones , 2010, Lasers in Medical Science.

[24]  D. Teti,et al.  Changes in inflammatory mediators in peri-implant fluid after implant insertion. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[25]  R. Moreira,et al.  The effect of low-intensity laser therapy on bone healing around titanium implants: a histometric study in rabbits. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  J. Sheridan,et al.  Early wound healing following one-stage dental implant placement with and without antibiotic prophylaxis: a pilot study. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  Sokki Sathaiah,et al.  Infrared Laser Photobiomodulation ( (cid:1) 830 nm) on Bone Tissue Around Dental Implants: A Raman Spectroscopy and Scanning Electronic Microscopy Study in Rabbits , 2007 .

[28]  Michele Henry,et al.  Mitochondrial signal transduction in accelerated wound and retinal healing by near-infrared light therapy. , 2004, Mitochondrion.

[29]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  The effect of titanium surface roughness on the adhesion of monocytes and their secretion of TNF-alpha and PGE2. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  F. Panagakos,et al.  Detection of prostaglandin E2 and matrix metalloproteinases in implant crevicular fluid. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.