Prosthetic feet: State-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle–foot biomechanics

Numerous prosthetic feet are currently on the market for individuals with a transtibial amputation, each device aimed at raising the 3C-level (control, comfort and cosmetics) with slightly different characteristics. In general, prosthetic feet can be classified into three categories. These are, following the time line: conventional feet (CF), energy-storing-and-returning (ESR) feet and the recent so-called ‘bionic’ feet. Researchers have shown enhanced performance properties of ESR feet compared with early CF. However, even with the advanced technology, none of the ESR feet is capable of significantly reducing energy cost of walking or enhancing prosthetic gait (Nielsen et al. J Prosthet Orthotics 1989;1:24–31; Waters et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:42–46; Torburn et al. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990;27:369–384). From the 1990s, gradually more attention has been paid to the incorporation of active elements in prosthetic feet as the passive devices are not capable of providing the individual with sufficient ankle power during gait. Most part of the ‘bionic’ devices are still on the research level nowadays but one can expect that they will become available on the market soon. In this article, the evolution of prosthetic feet over the last two decades is reflected. The importance of mimicking human ankle–foot biomechanics with prosthetic feet is briefly discussed. Prior work in both objective and subjective evaluation of prosthetic gait is reported.

[1]  R. Seymour Prosthetics and orthotics : lower limb and spinal , 2002 .

[2]  S. Gard,et al.  The effect of a shock-absorbing pylon on the gait of persons with unilateral transtibial amputation. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  D. Lefeber,et al.  A pneumatically powered below-knee prosthesis: Design specifications and first experiments with an amputee , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[4]  D. Barth,et al.  Gait Analysis and Energy Cost of Below‐Knee Amputees Wearing Six Different Prosthetic Feet , 1992 .

[5]  P. Bonato,et al.  An EMG-position controlled system for an active ankle-foot prosthesis: an initial experimental study , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[6]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  An ankle-foot emulation system for the study of human walking biomechanics , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[7]  J. Didier,et al.  Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J Perry,et al.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Pneumatic artificial muscles: Actuators for robotics and automation , 2002 .

[12]  W D Spence,et al.  A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. Gage An overview of normal walking. , 1990, Instructional course lectures.

[14]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Artificial Muscles : Actuators for Biorobotic Systems , 1999 .

[15]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTHETIC FEET ON BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEE WALKING , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[16]  Donald G. Shurr,et al.  Gait Comparisons for Below-Knee Amputees Using a Flex-Foot™ Versus a Conventional Prosthetic Foot , 1991 .

[17]  J S Arora,et al.  Accelerographic, temporal, and distance gait factors in below-knee amputees. , 1977, Physical therapy.

[18]  G.A. Pratt,et al.  Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot , 1999, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[19]  K. Siegel,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[20]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Muscle-Like Pneumatic Actuators for Below-Knee Prostheses, , 2000 .

[21]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[22]  C. Snijders,et al.  Peroneus longus and tibialis anterior muscle activity in the stance phase. A quantified electromyographic study of 10 controls and 25 patients with chronic ankle instability. , 1995, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  D. Winter Energy generation and absorption at the ankle and knee during fast, natural, and slow cadences. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Controlling a bipedal walking robot actuated by pleated pneumatic artificial muscles , 2006, Robotica.

[25]  Michael Günther,et al.  Joint stiffness of the ankle and the knee in running. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Michael R. Menard,et al.  Subjective and Objective Analysis of an Energy-Storing Prosthetic Foot , 1989 .

[27]  M. Rodgers Dynamic foot biomechanics. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[28]  S.K. Au,et al.  Biomechanical Design of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[29]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[30]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Second generation pleated pneumatic artificial muscle and its robotic applications , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[31]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[32]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[33]  L. Miller,et al.  Analysis of a vertical compliance prosthetic foot. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Decomposition-Based Control for a Powered Knee and Ankle Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[35]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Effect of a shock-absorbing pylon on transmission of heel strike forces during the gait of people with unilateral trans-tibial amputations: A pilot study , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[37]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[38]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Development of Powered Prosthetic Lower Limb , 1998 .

[39]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Proxy-Based Sliding Mode Control of a Manipulator Actuated by Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[40]  D. Lefeber,et al.  Design of a Powered Below Knee Prosthesis , 2007 .

[41]  te Riele,et al.  The HEELfoot : design of a plantarflexing prosthetic foot , 2003 .

[42]  S. Naumann,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND METABOLIC FACTORS IN THE GAIT OF CONGENITAL BELOW KNEE AMPUTEES: A Comparison of the SACH and Seattle Feet , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[43]  Hannu Alaranta,et al.  Practical Benefits of Flex-Foot in Below-Knee Amputees , 1991 .

[44]  J. Perry,et al.  Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[45]  E. Ayyappa,et al.  Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  S. Gard,et al.  The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  S. Simon Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological Function. , 1993 .

[48]  G K Klute,et al.  Mechanical properties of prosthetic limbs: adapting to the patient. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[49]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  The Concept and Design of Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscles , 2001 .

[50]  B. Bresler The Forces and Moments in the Leg During Level Walking , 1950, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[51]  D. Shurr,et al.  Comparison of Energy Cost and Gait Efficiency During Ambulation in Below-Knee Amputees Using Different Prosthetic Feet—A Preliminary Report , 1988 .

[52]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  The SPARKy (Spring Ankle With Regenerative Kinetics) Project: Design and Analysis of a Robotic Transtibial Prosthesis With Regenerative Kinetics , 2007 .

[53]  P V Komi,et al.  Medial gastrocnemius muscle behavior during human running and walking. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[54]  J. Perry,et al.  Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.