No capture outside the attentional window

A recent study has proposed that attentional window determines when the color singletons capture visual attention (Belopolsky, Zwaan, Theeuwes, & Kramer, 2007). The present study used the additional singleton paradigm of Theeuwes (1992) and showed that capture was abolished when the size of the attentional window was reduced by focusing on RSVP stream in the center of the screen. Narrowing of attentional window also resulted in increase in search slope even in such a simple task as the pop-out detection. These findings suggest that attentional window plays a crucial role in visual selection and in the occurrence of attentional capture.

[1]  T Kumada,et al.  Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Transfer of Information into Working Memory during Attentional Capture , 2022 .

[3]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional effects on preattentive vision: spatial precues affect the detection of simple features. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The Role of Awareness in Processing of Oculomotor Capture: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Detecting the presence of a singleton involves focal attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  H. Nothdurft Focal attention in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[10]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention , 2000 .

[11]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. Sagi,et al.  Vision outside the focus of attention , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  V. Lollo,et al.  Visual search is postponed during the attentional blink until the system is suitably reconfigured. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. Theeuwes Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Albert Costa,et al.  The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[26]  Bryan R. Burnham,et al.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display’s appearance can mediate attentional capture , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[28]  K. Cave,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Stimulus-driven capture and contingent capture. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[32]  H. Egeth,et al.  Target-nontarget similarity modulates stimulus-driven control in visual search , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  S. Luck,et al.  On the role of selective attention in visual perception. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  C. Spence,et al.  The suppression of reflexive visual and auditory orienting when attention is otherwise engaged. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  M. B. Fisher Time relations in the effect of a surrounding field on foveal critical flickerfrequency. , 1941 .

[37]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Shihui Han,et al.  Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): The effect on perceptual sensitivity , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons , 2008, Vision Research.

[43]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Top–down biases win against focal attention in the fusiform face area , 2007, NeuroImage.

[44]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  J. Theeuwes Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.

[47]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The limits of top-down control of visual attention. , 2009, Acta psychologica.