Analysis of time lags and other sources of error of the DexCom SEVEN continuous glucose monitor.

BACKGROUND It has been assumed that continuous glucose sensors show substantial time lags versus blood glucose. This assumption has led to suggestions that sensors are less accurate during rapidly changing glucose levels and that sensors should only be calibrated when glucose levels are stable. The analysis presented here tests the assumption of substantial sensor time lag and its suggested effects using clinical data from the DexCom (San Diego, CA) SEVEN. METHODS Sensor and blood glucose data were collected from 117 adult subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes. Each subject wore the sensor for 7 days and underwent an 8-10-h in-clinic tracking study during which blood glucose was measured every 15-20 min. Accuracy (absolute relative difference [ARD]) versus blood glucose rate of change was evaluated on the in-clinic data set. The effect on accuracy of calibration during rapid rates of change was evaluated on the combined home-use and in-clinic data set. RESULTS Average sensor time lag versus blood glucose was 5.7 min. Mean ARD versus rate of change (less than -2 to >2 mg/dL/minute) ranged between 15.0% to 16.3%. Across rates of change during calibration, mean ARD after calibration ranged between 13.2% and 16.0%. Calibration with reference measurements instead of patient measurements improved overall mean ARD from 16.0% to 8.5%. CONCLUSIONS For this sensor, the assumption of substantial time lag and its suggested effects may be incorrect. The main source of error is the calibration process.

[1]  Boris P Kovatchev,et al.  Graphical and numerical evaluation of continuous glucose sensing time lag. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[2]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[3]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  Neovascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane microarchitecture. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  R. Mazze,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Is CGM ready for real time? , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[5]  L. Jovanovic,et al.  Relationship of Fasting and Hourly Blood Glucose Levels to HbA1c Values , 2006, Diabetes Care.

[6]  Darrell M Wilson,et al.  Limitations of statistical measures of error in assessing the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors. , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[7]  G. Steil,et al.  Determination of plasma glucose during rapid glucose excursions with a subcutaneous glucose sensor. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[8]  Peter G Jacobs,et al.  Feasibility of continuous long-term glucose monitoring from a subcutaneous glucose sensor in humans. , 2004, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  J M Anderson,et al.  Inflammatory response to implants. , 1988, ASAIO transactions.

[10]  Andreas Pfützner,et al.  Evaluation of CGMS during rapid blood glucose changes in patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2006, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  J Hans DeVries,et al.  Comparison of a needle-type and a microdialysis continuous glucose monitor in type 1 diabetic patients. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[12]  Boris Kovatchev,et al.  A Critical Appraisal of the Continuous Glucose–Error Grid Analysis , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[13]  Philip J Stout,et al.  A novel approach to mitigating the physiological lag between blood and interstitial fluid glucose measurements. , 2004, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[14]  S. Garg,et al.  Improved glucose excursions using an implantable real-time continuous glucose sensor in adults with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[15]  M. Shults,et al.  A subcutaneous glucose sensor with improved longevity, dynamic range, and stability of calibration. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[16]  J. Bolinder,et al.  Protracted glucose fall in subcutaneous adipose tissue and skeletal muscle compared with blood during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia , 1997, Diabetologia.

[17]  S. Weinzimer.  Analysis: How to Inspect When She's Expecting: Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes During Pregnancy , 2005 .