Estimating the Effective Sample Size to Select Independent Measurements in a Reverberation Chamber

In reverberation chambers (RCs), measurements are usually performed by changing the boundary conditions using a mode stirrer. The major difficulty is to select uncorrelated samples in order to make a statistical analysis of the data. Furthermore, the knowledge of the number of independent samples is of crucial importance to assess the measurement accuracy. To evaluate whether measured data are independent, the conventional method compares the autocorrelation function (ACF) with the critical value 0.37. However, this criterion is generally not appropriate because the ACF probability density function (pdf) depends strongly on the sample size. For a measurement series of length N, the effective sample size (ESS) is defined as the number N' < N of independent samples, which would provide the same information as the N-size sample. This paper aims to provide a new method based on autoregressive (AR) models and the central limit theorem (CLT) in the case of dependent data, for estimating the ESS. The proposed method is easy to implement since it requires only the knowledge of simple statistical parameters. Moreover, it provides useful guidelines to assess the maximum number of independent samples available with the mode stirrer. Experimental results are in good agreement with the theoretical models, either for the electric field or the received power.

[1]  M. S. Bartlett,et al.  Some Aspects of the Time-Correlation Problem in Regard to Tests of Significance , 1935 .

[2]  M. Bartlett On the Theoretical Specification and Sampling Properties of Autocorrelated Time‐Series , 1946 .

[3]  John S. White Asymptotic expansions for the mean and variance of the serial correlation coefficient , 1961 .

[4]  M. Stephens EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons , 1974 .

[5]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Time Series. , 1976 .

[6]  N. Ghosh,et al.  Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (the Box-Jenkins Approach) , 1976 .

[7]  F. Zwiers,et al.  The interpretation and estimation of effective sample size , 1984 .

[8]  H. White Asymptotic theory for econometricians , 1985 .

[9]  Jonathan D. Cryer,et al.  Time Series Analysis , 1986, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[10]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[11]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[12]  D. Hill Plane wave integral representation for fields in reverberation chambers , 1998 .

[13]  M. Backstrom,et al.  Stirrer efficiency in FOA reverberation chambers. Evaluation of correlation coefficients and chi-squared tests , 2000, IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.00CH37016).

[14]  P.-S. Kildal,et al.  Characterization of antennas for mobile and wireless terminals by using reverberation chambers: improved accuracy by platform stirring , 2001, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 2001 Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37229).

[15]  Note on the bias in the estimation of the serial correlation coefficient of AR(1) processes , 2001 .

[16]  Paul Hallbjörner A model for the number of independent samples in reverberation chambers , 2002 .

[17]  D. Hill,et al.  Spatial-correlation functions of fields and energy density in a reverberation chamber , 2002 .

[18]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Econometric Theory and Methods , 2003 .

[19]  Madsen,et al.  Models for the number of independent samples in reverberation chamber measurements with mechanical, frequency, and combined stirring , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[20]  J. Nitsch,et al.  Statistical interpretation of autocorrelation coefficients for fields in mode-stirred chambers , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2005. EMC 2005..

[21]  P. Hallbjorner Estimating the number of independent samples in reverberation chamber measurements from sample differences , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[22]  P. Besnier,et al.  Effect of the size of the antenna on measurements distribution in reverberation chamber , 2007, 2007 18th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[23]  P. Besnier,et al.  Investigation of Reverberation Chamber Measurements Through High-Power Goodness-of-Fit Tests , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.