Understanding the pH-responsive behavior of graphene oxide membrane in removing ions and organic micropollulants

Abstract This paper reports the systematic performance evaluation and mechanism elucidation of a multi-layered graphene oxide (GO) membrane in removing ionic and organic species from water at different pH levels. The rejections of representative monovalent (Na + , Cl - ) and multivalent ions (SO 4 2- , Mg 2+ ) as well as organic dyes (methylene blue, rhodamine-WT) and pharmaceutical and personal care products (triclosan, triclocarban) by the GO membrane were tested in a reverse osmosis membrane system. It was found that, at pH 7, the GO membrane exhibited high removal of multivalent cations/anions and all tested organics, regardless of their charges, sizes, or hydrophobic properties, but low removal of monovalent ions. Such removal behavior is dramatically different from that of traditional nanofiltration membranes, which are often negatively charged and can only remove multivalent ions and organics that also bear negative charges. As pH varied, the key properties (e.g., charge, interlayer spacing) of the GO membrane were significantly changed, leading to different pH-dependent interfacial phenomena and separation mechanisms, and demonstrating the promise of using the GO membrane as a pH-responsive membrane. It was also revealed that the molecular shape of some organics (e.g., triclocarban) greatly affected their removal due to the mobility and thus π-π interaction of such organics with the carbon surface of the GO membrane. Finally, implications for the future development of high-performance GO membranes are discussed.

[1]  S. C. Kumbharkar,et al.  Surface modification of polyacrylonitrile based ultrafiltration membrane , 2006 .

[2]  Baoxia Mi,et al.  Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review. , 2004, Water research.

[4]  Baoshan Xing,et al.  Effects of solution chemistry on adsorption of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) by graphenes and carbon nanotubes. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Benjamin D. Stanford,et al.  Pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in U.S. drinking water. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  K. Bester.  Fate of Triclosan and Triclosan-Methyl in Sewage TreatmentPlants and Surface Waters , 2005, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[7]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Antimicrobial Properties of Graphene Oxide Nanosheets: Why Size Matters. , 2015, ACS nano.

[8]  Jie Li,et al.  Layer-by-layer self-assembly of polycation/GO nanofiltration membrane with enhanced stability and fouling resistance , 2016 .

[9]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[10]  Baoxia Mi,et al.  Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide membranes via electrostatic interaction , 2014 .

[11]  D. Bagley,et al.  The rejection of endocrine disrupting and pharmaceutically active compounds by NF and RO membranes as a function of compound and water matrix properties , 2008 .

[12]  Emerging investigators series: silica-crosslinked graphene oxide membrane and its unique capability in removing neutral organic molecules from water , 2016 .

[13]  Baoxia Mi,et al.  Membrane surface modification with TiO2–graphene oxide for enhanced photocatalytic performance , 2014 .

[14]  I. V. Grigorieva,et al.  Precise and Ultrafast Molecular Sieving Through Graphene Oxide Membranes , 2014, Science.

[15]  W. Lu,et al.  Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. , 2010, ACS nano.

[16]  K. Kimura,et al.  Rejection of neutral endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) by RO membranes , 2004 .

[17]  Baoxia Mi,et al.  Regenerable Polyelectrolyte Membrane for Ultimate Fouling Control in Forward Osmosis. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Ken Rainwater,et al.  Energy analysis and efficiency assessment of reverse osmosis desalination process , 2011 .

[19]  S. R. Wickramasinghe,et al.  Stimuli-responsive membranes , 2010 .

[20]  Chao Gao,et al.  Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification , 2013 .

[21]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Nanometric Graphene Oxide Framework Membranes with Enhanced Heavy Metal Removal via Nanofiltration. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  R. Halden,et al.  Co-occurrence of triclocarban and triclosan in U.S. water resources. , 2005 .

[24]  Jeffrey H. Harwell,et al.  Influence of Rhodamine WT Properties on Sorption and Transport in Subsurface Media , 1993 .

[25]  Sauro Succi,et al.  Role of Oxygen Functionalities in Graphene Oxide Architectural Laminate Subnanometer Spacing and Water Transport. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  NF/RO filtration of the hydrophobic ionogenic compound triclosan : Transport mechanisms and the influence of membrane fouling , 2008 .

[27]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Review of Endocrine-Disrupting-Compound Removal Technologies in Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants: An EU Perspective , 2011 .

[28]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Interaction of Graphene Oxide with Bacterial Cell Membranes: Insights from Force Spectroscopy , 2015 .

[29]  Wei Chen,et al.  Adsorption of polar, nonpolar, and substituted aromatics to colloidal graphene oxide nanoparticles. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[30]  Yulong Ying,et al.  Salt concentration, pH and pressure controlled separation of small molecules through lamellar graphene oxide membranes. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[31]  Muhammad Fazalul Rahman,et al.  Occurrences of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment and their removal from drinking water: Challenges in the context of the developing world , 2009 .

[32]  Kimberly L. Jones,et al.  Graphene oxide functionalized polyethersulfone membrane to reduce organic fouling , 2016 .

[33]  Anthony D. Kappell,et al.  Triclocarban Influences Antibiotic Resistance and Alters Anaerobic Digester Microbial Community Structure. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  A. Torrents,et al.  Fate of Triclosan and Methyltriclosan in soil from biosolids application. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[35]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  The global challenge for adequate and safe water , 2006 .

[36]  A. Torrents,et al.  Fate of Triclocarban, Triclosan and Methyltriclosan during wastewater and biosolids treatment processes. , 2013, Water research.

[37]  E. R. Nightingale,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL THEORY OF ION SOLVATION. EFFECTIVE RADII OF HYDRATED IONS , 1959 .

[38]  Quan-hong Yang,et al.  On the origin of the stability of graphene oxide membranes in water. , 2015, Nature chemistry.

[39]  A. Torrents,et al.  Influence of thermal hydrolysis-anaerobic digestion treatment of wastewater solids on concentrations of triclosan, triclocarban, and their transformation products in biosolids. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[40]  Shaofan Li,et al.  Swelling of Graphene Oxide Membranes in Aqueous Solution: Characterization of Interlayer Spacing and Insight into Water Transport Mechanisms. , 2017, ACS nano.

[41]  Peiyi Wu,et al.  Preparation of a positively charged nanofiltration membrane based on hydrophilic–hydrophobic transformation of a poly(ionic liquid) , 2015 .

[42]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Fate of triclosan and evidence for reductive dechlorination of triclocarban in estuarine sediments. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating Nanofiltration Membrane Performance to Membrane Charge (Electrokinetic) Characteristics , 2000 .

[44]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[45]  Rong Wang,et al.  Graphene oxide as effective selective barriers on a hollow fiber membrane for water treatment process , 2015 .

[46]  B. Mi,et al.  Organic Fouling of Graphene Oxide Membranes and Its Implications for Membrane Fouling Control in Engineered Osmosis. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Baoxia Mi,et al.  Graphene Oxide Membranes for Ionic and Molecular Sieving , 2014, Science.

[48]  T. Karanfil,et al.  Adsorption of aromatic organic contaminants by graphene nanosheets: comparison with carbon nanotubes and activated carbon. , 2013, Water research.

[49]  F. Martínez,et al.  SOLUTION THERMODYNAMICS OF TRICLOSAN AND TRICLOCARBAN IN SOME VOLATILE ORGANIC SOLVENTS , 2012, Vitae.

[50]  Linda Zou,et al.  Graphene oxide-assisted membranes: Fabrication and potential applications in desalination and water purification , 2015 .

[51]  M. Wells.  Log DOW: Key to Understanding and Regulating Wastewater-Derived Contaminants , 2006 .

[52]  Jun Wang,et al.  Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by graphene and graphene oxide nanosheets. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  Hung‐Suck Park,et al.  Sorption of triclosan onto activated carbon, kaolinite and montmorillonite: effects of pH, ionic strength, and humic acid. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[54]  Aimin Li,et al.  Effects of the oxidation degree of graphene oxide on the adsorption of methylene blue. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.