Virtual word of mouth and willingness to pay for consumer electronic innovations

The authors examine the impact of virtual word-of-mouth (vWOM) communication on willingness to pay (WTP) for an innovation. A series of hypotheses are developed that link vWOM to the credibility of innovation information, perceived utilitarian value, and the perceived hedonic value of an innovation, which are in turn hypothesized to influence WTP. The authors test these hypotheses using data collected in Japan from 658 potential adopters of e-readers and from 565 potential adopters of smartphones. Findings indicate that, in both samples, vWOM is positively correlated with the perceived credibility of innovation information, which in turn is positively correlated with both perceived utilitarian value and perceived hedonic value. WTP is also positively correlated with an innovation's perceived utilitarian and perceived hedonic value. In addition, the path between vWOM and perceived hedonic value is positive and significant in both samples. However, the path between vWOM and perceived utilitarian value is positive and significant in the smartphone sample, but not in the e-reader sample. The empirical findings provide support for theoretical arguments that link WTP for complex consumer electronic products to consumer perceptions of utilitarian and hedonic value. The results also have important implications for the creation of vWOM strategies designed to reduce the price sensitivity of potential adopters.

[1]  J. Arndt Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product , 1967 .

[2]  L. Phillips,et al.  The persuasive effect of source credibility: a situational analysis. , 1978, Public opinion quarterly.

[3]  V. Srinivasan Network Models for Estimating Brand-Specific Effects in Multi-Attribute Marketing Models , 1979 .

[4]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[5]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[6]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[7]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[8]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[9]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[10]  V. Zeithaml Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[11]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Purchase Intentions and the Dimensions of Innovation: An Exploratory Model , 1990 .

[12]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size , 1993 .

[13]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[14]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Communication Effects of Advertising versus Direct Experience When both Search and Experience Attributes Are Present , 1995 .

[15]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources , 1997 .

[16]  Terry Clark,et al.  Consumption as Self-Presentation: A Socioanalytic Interpretation of Mrs. Cage , 1999 .

[17]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  The link between attractiveness of “Extrabrand” attributes and the adoption of innovations , 1999 .

[18]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[19]  Michael Song,et al.  Message and source factors, market uncertainty, and extrafunctional information processing: hypotheses and empirical evidence , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[20]  Robert M. Schindler,et al.  Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information , 2001 .

[21]  Z. John Zhang,et al.  Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[22]  B. Skiera,et al.  Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase , 2002 .

[23]  Wanki Moon,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Non‐biotech Foods in the U.S. and U.K. , 2003 .

[24]  Kirk L. Wakefield,et al.  Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income , 2003 .

[25]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use-Diffusion Model , 2004 .

[26]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[27]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Peter Boatwright,et al.  Incidental Prices and Their Effect on Willingness to Pay , 2004 .

[29]  Jeffrey Graham,et al.  Finding the “Missing Link”: Advertising's Impact on Word of Mouth, Web Searches, and Site Visits , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[30]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  Incorporating network externalities into the technology acceptance model , 2009 .

[31]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[32]  Simona Botti,et al.  The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions , 2011 .

[33]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The Effect of Personal and Virtual Word‐of‐Mouth on Technology Acceptance , 2012 .

[34]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  Personal Word of Mouth, Virtual Word of Mouth, and Innovation Use , 2013 .