Development of a test rig and a testing procedure for bicycle frame stiffness measurements

The stiffness measuring method for bicycle frames is not standardized, leading to a wide variety of test setups; they differ in many aspects such as applied load, support constraints and frame deflection measurement. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to this problem and to quantify the perturbing, unwanted side effects that influence the stiffness measurement of the bicycle frame. This is illustrated by developing a multi-purpose rating test method for bicycle frame stiffness. The proposed test rig design considers different aspects which should be taken into account when measuring the bicycle frame stiffness. In the experimental setup, it is observed that the contribution of the test bench compliance led to 21% difference in the frame stiffness results; the influence due to the head, the tube-bearing type the corresponding preload resulted in up to 19% difference in the stiffness results between the lowest and highest stiffness values measured; hysteresis effects caused by pulleys are estimated to introduce errors up to 11%; and the influence due to the operator variability and sensor accuracy is estimated to be less than 3%.

[1]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  A proposed field test method and an assessment of the rotational drag of contemporary front bicycle wheels , 2015 .

[2]  M L Hull,et al.  A pedal dynamometer for off-road bicycling. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  M. Saunders,et al.  Comparison of physiological responses and performance between mountain bicycles with differing suspension systems. , 2011, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[4]  Jean-Marc Drouet,et al.  Development of Multi-platform Instrumented Force Pedals for Track Cycling (P49) , 2008 .

[5]  Nicola Petrone,et al.  Methods for evaluating the radial structural behaviour of racing bicycle wheels , 2011 .

[6]  Anton Sabo,et al.  Construction of a test bench for bicycle rim and disc brakes , 2010 .

[7]  Mark Jermy,et al.  Translational and rotational aerodynamic drag of composite construction bicycle wheels , 2008 .

[8]  Nicola Petrone,et al.  Development of a test method for the comparative analysis of bicycle saddle vibration transmissibility , 2013 .

[9]  Michael T. Lebec,et al.  Overuse Injuries Associated with Mountain Biking: Is Single-Speed Riding a Predisposing Factor? , 2014 .

[10]  Nicola Petrone,et al.  Engineering evaluation of "reactivity" of racing bicycle wheels , 2014 .

[11]  Jean-Marc Drouet,et al.  The relative contribution of road bicycle components on vibration induced to the cyclist , 2015 .

[12]  Jean-Marc Drouet,et al.  Development of a three-load component instrumented stem for road cycling , 2012 .

[13]  James A. Nemes,et al.  Utilization of FEA in the design of composite bicycle frames , 1995 .

[14]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Evaluation of the stiffnesses of the Achilles tendon and soleus from the apparent stiffness of the triceps surae , 2015, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  Jean-Marc Drouet,et al.  A Laboratory Excitation Technique to Test Road Bike Vibration Transmission , 2016 .

[17]  Jean-Marc Drouet,et al.  Technique to Measure the Dynamic Behavior of Road Bike Wheels , 2012 .

[18]  John Sheridan,et al.  Aerodynamic performance and riding posture in road cycling and triathlon , 2015 .

[19]  Yung-Sheng Liu,et al.  Analyzing the influences of bicycle suspension systems on pedaling forces and human body vibration , 2014 .