Standardized Method for Defining a 1-mm2 Region of Interest for Calculation of Mitotic Rate on Melanoma Whole Slide Images.

CONTEXT.— Mitotic rate counting is essential in pathologic evaluations in melanoma. The American Joint Committee on Cancer recommends reporting the number of mitotic figures (MFs) in a 1-mm2 area encompassing the "hot spot." There is currently no standard procedure for delineating a 1-mm2 region of interest for MF counting on a digital whole slide image (WSI) of melanoma. OBJECTIVE.— To establish a standardized method to enclose a 1-mm2 region of interest for MF counting in melanoma based on WSIs and assess the method's effectiveness. DESIGN.— Whole slide images were visualized using the ImageScope viewer (Aperio). Different monitors and viewing magnifications were explored and the annotation tools provided by ImageScope were evaluated. For validation, we compared mitotic rates obtained from WSIs with our method and those from glass slides with traditional microscopy with 30 melanoma cases. RESULTS.— Of the monitors we examined, a 32-inch monitor with 3840 × 2160 resolution was optimal for counting MFs within a 1-mm2 region of interest in melanoma. When WSIs were viewed in the ImageScope viewer, ×10 to ×20 magnification during screening could efficiently locate a hot spot and ×20 to ×40 magnification during counting could accurately identify MFs. Fixed-shape annotations with 500 × 500-μm squares or circles can precisely and efficiently enclose a 1-mm2 region of interest. Our method on WSIs was able to produce a higher mitotic rate than with glass slides. CONCLUSIONS.— Whole slide images may be used to efficiently count MFs. We recommend fixed-shape annotation with 500 × 500-μm squares or circles for routine practice in counting MFs for melanoma.

[1]  Skin Cancer: Have melanoma and skin cancer finally met their match? , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Chiaravalloti,et al.  A deep look into thin melanomas: What’s new for the clinician and the impact on the patient☆☆☆ , 2018, International journal of women's dermatology.

[3]  Shai Dekel,et al.  Computer-aided diagnostics in digital pathology: automated evaluation of early-phase pancreatic cancer in mice , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[4]  Gang Wang,et al.  Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Xin Qi,et al.  Exploring automatic prostate histopathology image gleason grading via local structure modeling , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  Yuting Zhang,et al.  Tumor mitotic rate is a more powerful prognostic indicator than ulceration in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma , 2003, Cancer.

[7]  Walter H Henricks,et al.  Validation of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  Jeffrey E Gershenwald,et al.  Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[10]  V. Sondak,et al.  Prognostic significance of mitotic rate in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of patients in the multi-institutional American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging database. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J F Simpson,et al.  Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Stage I melanoma of the skin: Evaluation of prognosis according to histologic characteristics , 1981, Cancer.

[13]  D. Polsky,et al.  Mitotic Rate in Melanoma: Prognostic Value of Immunostaining and Computer-assisted Image Analysis , 2013, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[14]  Toby C. Cornish,et al.  US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Whole Slide Imaging for Primary Diagnosis: A Key Milestone Is Reached and New Questions Are Raised. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[15]  MD Frcpa Rajmohan Murali MBBS,et al.  Clinical and Pathologic Factors Associated with Distant Metastasis and Survival in Patients with Thin Primary Cutaneous Melanoma , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  Hans Peter Graf,et al.  Mitotic index of invasive breast carcinoma. Achieving clinically meaningful precision and evaluating tertial cutoffs. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[17]  Shaimaa Al-Janabi,et al.  Evaluation of Mitotic Activity Index in Breast Cancer Using Whole Slide Digital Images , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Seung‐Mo Hong,et al.  Recent updates on grading and classification of neuroendocrine tumors. , 2017, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[19]  John R. Gilbertson,et al.  Computer aided diagnostic tools aim to empower rather than replace pathologists: Lessons learned from computational chess , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[20]  K. Plate,et al.  Classification of meningiomas-advances and controversies. , 2017, Chinese clinical oncology.

[21]  Danny Crookes,et al.  Assisted Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[22]  A. El-Menyar,et al.  Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: An up-to-date literature review. , 2017, Journal of cancer research and therapeutics.

[23]  B K Armstrong,et al.  Melanoma of the skin. , 1984, British medical bulletin.

[24]  Sing Kai Lo,et al.  Interobserver Reproducibility of Histopathologic Prognostic Variables in Primary Cutaneous Melanomas , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[25]  A. Gunal,et al.  Are we counting mitoses correctly? , 2013, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[26]  D. Kozieł,et al.  Tumor Digital Masking Allows Precise Patient Triaging: A Study Based on Ki-67 Scoring in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2018, Scanning.

[27]  Gyan Bhanot,et al.  Computerized Image-Based Detection and Grading of Lymphocytic Infiltration in HER2+ Breast Cancer Histopathology , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Stephen M. Hewitt,et al.  Agreement in Histological Assessment of Mitotic Activity Between Microscopy and Digital Whole Slide Images Informs Conversion for Clinical Diagnosis , 2019, Academic pathology.