QoS mechanism for prioritized flow-control for network elements handling high-speed traffic

Handling of QoS priorities to differentiate flows is critical in the next generation Internet with ever increasing traffic. We present a scheme called p-persistent binary tree arbiter (PBTA) that approximates the general processor sharing (GPS) model. PBTA arbitrates between contending flows based on various quality of service parameters which are mapped to their weights or priorities; and, by being stateful, it provides a fair arbitration among the contending flows across the individual timeslots. Our simulations show that PBTA provides a fair technique among the flows by providing the proper service ratios and transit times conforming to the appropriate traffic classes. The advantage of the scheme is that it requires no modifications to the other scheduling algorithms. The preliminary FPGA implementation shows that the mechanism is implementable, fast, and conservative in chip area.

[1]  Timuçin Özugur,et al.  Traffic management mechanism for fast arbitrations with QoS parameters , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[2]  Xiaolei Guo,et al.  A fast arbitration scheme for terabit packet switches , 1999, Seamless Interconnection for Universal Services. Global Telecommunications Conference. GLOBECOM'99. (Cat. No.99CH37042).

[3]  S. M. Shahrier A fast round robin priority port scheduler for high capacity ATM switches , 2001, Joint 4th IEEE International Conference on ATM(ICATM'01) and High Speed Intelligent Internet Symposium. ICATM 2001 (Cat. No.00EX486).

[4]  Danny H. K. Tsang,et al.  Modified fair queueing for finite buffer in ATM networks , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Communications (Cat. No. 99CH36311).

[5]  Abhay Parekh,et al.  A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: the single-node case , 1993, TNET.

[6]  M. Degermark,et al.  Next-generation IP switches and routers , 1999, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Harish Sethu,et al.  On the relationship between absolute and relative fairness bounds , 2002, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Geoff Huston,et al.  Next Steps for the IP QoS Architecture , 2000, RFC.