Paper Versus Electronic Medical Records: The Effects of Access on Physicians' Decisions to Use Complex Information Technologies

This study examines physicians' responses to complex information technologies (IT) in the health care supply chain. We extend individual-level IT adoption models by incorporating a new construct: system accessibility. The main premise of the study is, when faced with a decision between alternate IT systems, individual users tend to select and make use of the technology or system that is most readily accessible. We discuss both physical and logical dimensions of accessibility as they relate to adoption of electronic medical records (EMR). Physical accessibility refers to the availability of computers that can be used to access EMR, while logical accessibility refers to the ease or difficulty of logging into the system. Using data from a survey of 199 physicians practicing in a large U.S. hospital, we show that, when deciding between the paper chart and EMR, accessibility is an important consideration in a physician's decision to use the system. Both dimensions of accessibility act as barriers to EMR use intentions through their indirect effect on physicians' perceptions of EMR usefulness and ease of use. Logical access also has a direct effect on EMR use intentions. We conclude that accessibility is an important factor that limits acceptance of complex IT such as EMR.

[1]  W. Scott.  The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[2]  Fabian A. Ehikhamenor,et al.  Internet facilities: use and non-use by Nigerian university scientists , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Ann Scheck McAlearney,et al.  Research Paper: Organizational and Physician Perspectives about Facilitating Handheld Computer Use in Clinical Practice: Results of a Cross-Site Qualitative Study , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Where To Go From Here? Thoughts on Future Directions for Research on Individual-Level Technology Adoption with a Focus on Decision Making , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[6]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[7]  James G. Anderson,et al.  Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems , 1997, CACM.

[8]  A Gilmore,et al.  Understanding usage of an Internet based information resource for teachers: The assessment resource banks , 2001 .

[9]  Hall Ef.  Physical therapists in private practice: information sources and information needs. , 1995 .

[10]  Andrew P. Hardy.  The selection of channels when seeking information: Cost/benefit vs least-effort , 1982, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Research Paper: Emotional Aspects of Computer-based Provider Order Entry: A Qualitative Study , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Elihu Katz,et al.  Social Relations and Innovation in the Medical Profession: The Epidemiology of a New Drug , 1955 .

[13]  Guy Paré,et al.  Research Paper: The Effects of Creating Psychological Ownership on Physicians' Acceptance of Clinical Information Systems , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Hospital Adoption of Information Technologies and Improved Patient Safety: A Study of 98 Hospitals in Florida , 2007, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[15]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Access to, usage of, and outcomes from an electronic messaging system , 1988, TOIS.

[16]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Logins and Bailouts: Measuring Access, Use, and Success in Digital Libraries , 1998 .

[17]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Research Paper: Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Craig Van Slyke,et al.  Paper versus Electronic: Challenges Associated with Physicians' Usage of Electronic Medical Records , 2007, HICSS.

[19]  Mark Vandenbosch,et al.  Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions - Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  ETA S. BERNER,et al.  Review Paper: Will the Wave Finally Break? A Brief View of the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in the United States , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  J. Weedman.  The Structure of Incentive: Design and Client Roles in Application-Oriented Research , 1998 .

[22]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Usability of Online Services: The Role of Technology Readiness and Context , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[23]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING: THE EFFECTS OF TASK COMPLEXITY AND SOURCE ACCESSIBILITY ON INFORMATION GATHERING BEHAVIOR* , 1983 .

[24]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information: Implications for the delivery of information systems and services , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  The dimensions of accessibility to online information: implications for implementing office information systems , 1984, TOIS.

[26]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  K. K. Kim,et al.  An examination of factors for the strategic use of information systems in the healthcare industry , 1990 .

[28]  T. Allen,et al.  Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[30]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information accessibility reconsidered , 1992 .

[31]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Reconceptualizing Compatability Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research , 2006, MIS Q..

[32]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Accelerating U.S. EHR Adoption: How to Get There From Here. Recommendations Based on the 2004 ACMI Retreat , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  D R Wholey,et al.  The diffusion of information technology among health maintenance organizations. , 2000, Health care management review.

[37]  Barbara LeTourneau.  Managing physician resistance to change. , 2004, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[38]  Treister Nw.  Physician acceptance of new medical information systems: the field of dreams. , 1998 .

[39]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[40]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them? , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[41]  David W. Bates,et al.  Position Paper: Factors and Forces Affecting EHR System Adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI Discussion , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[42]  David W. Bates,et al.  White Paper: Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[43]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  John C. Beachboard,et al.  Electronic Medical Records Use An Examination of Resident Physician Intentions , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[45]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Adoption of Telemedicine Technology by Health Care Organizations: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[46]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Variations in Decision Makers' Use of Information Sources: The Impact of Quality and Accessibility of Information , 1982 .

[49]  George R. Thoma,et al.  Research Paper: Using Wireless Handheld Computers to Seek Information at the Point of Care: An Evaluation by Clinicians , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[50]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[51]  Jayant V. Saraph,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management , 1989 .

[52]  Eileen G. Abels,et al.  Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions: part I: queries , 1996 .

[53]  Janelle Heineke,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Toward an Effective Strategy for the Diffusion and Use of Clinical Information Systems , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[54]  Nir Menachemi,et al.  Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians? , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[55]  H. David Sherman,et al.  Managing Physician Efficiency and Effectiveness in Providing Hospital Services , 1990, Health services management research.

[56]  W. Chismar,et al.  The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry , 2007 .

[57]  Yin Zhang.  Scholarly use of internet-based electronic resources , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[58]  Corey M. Angst,et al.  Reconceptualizing Compatibility Beliefs in Technology Acceptance , 2006 .

[59]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[61]  Moez Limayem,et al.  E-Mail and V-Mail Usage: Generalizing Across Technologies , 2000, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[62]  Qing Chang,et al.  How Low Should You Go? Low Response Rates and the Validity of Inference in IS Questionnaire Research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[63]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Doctors in a wired world: can professionalism survive connectivity? , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[64]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[65]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Informating the Clan: Controlling Physicians' Costs and Outcomes , 2004, MIS Q..

[66]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT-Based Innovations: Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[67]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[68]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[69]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[70]  Guy Paré,et al.  Research Paper: A Risk Assessment of Two Interorganizational Clinical Information Systems , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[71]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Anand Jeyaraj,et al.  A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[73]  Vincent S. Lai,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking , 2003, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[74]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Competence Constructs: Two-Stage Multi-Item Scale Development and Validation , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[75]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Taking Industry Seriously in Information Systems Research , 2005, MIS Q..

[76]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[77]  Melissa M. Honour,et al.  Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. , 2004, Health affairs.

[78]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[79]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..