A user-generated content analysis of tourists at wildlife tourism attractions

Captive wildlife tourism is an increasingly complex subsector of ecotourism due to the varying degrees of care given to the animals, interpretation or education provided, and tourist expectations of potential interaction with the animals. Two recent tourism trends are the growing wildlife tourism sphere of ecotourism and the increased use of social media in both marketing and for tourists to share their experiences. In scientific literature, the connection between social media and tourism was largely under-studied, and tourist behavior on Instagram after visiting wildlife tourism attractions (WTAs) has not been studied. Some researchers call for more tourism research using social media data created by tourists, called user-generated content (UGC), to understand tourist behaviors.This netnographic study examines tourists who visited a WTAs by analyzing their post-visit photos and captions on Instagram through the lens of involvement theory to evaluate the strength of their connection to wildlife and conservation. Previous research indicated wildlife tourism can have extraordinary benefits to conservation and communities, but some WTAs, some of which are photo-prop tourism attractions where animals are handed over to tourists for close-contact selfies, produce negative impacts on individual animals and entire species due to illegal sourcing, improper care, human interaction, and habituation.Findings from this study suggest WTAs with good or excellent conservation and welfare practices were found to lead to more highly involved tourists, ultimately benefitting community investment, animal welfare, and conservation efforts via the flow of tourist dollars and spread of information on social media, the tourist changing their behavior, or all the aforementioned. Conversely, WTAs with negative conservation and welfare practices were found not to foster the same level of tourist involvement as their counterparts, often leading to more anthropocentric Instagram posts that do not spread conservation messaging or imply appropriate tourist-animal interactions.The implications from this research suggest that WTA management practices should move toward a model focusing on conservation-themed interpretation, education, and positive animal welfare for the improvement of conservation efforts within wildlife and eco-tourism. Such models should keep up with evolving sustainability, responsible, and regenerative practices adopted by the tourism and outdoor recreation industry.

[1]  E. Arnold,et al.  Multispecies livelihoods: a posthumanist approach to wildlife ecotourism that promotes animal ethics , 2021, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.

[2]  R. Plowright,et al.  Ecological countermeasures for preventing zoonotic disease outbreaks: when ecological restoration is a human health imperative , 2021, Restoration ecology.

[3]  Caroline Winter A review of research into animal ethics in tourism: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on animal ethics in tourism , 2020 .

[4]  Kevin Markwell Koalas, bushfires and climate change: towards an ethic of care , 2020 .

[5]  Muchazondida Mkono Eco-hypocrisy and inauthenticity: Criticisms and confessions of the eco-conscious tourist/traveller , 2020 .

[6]  A. Lew,et al.  COVID-19 is expanding global consciousness and the sustainability of travel and tourism , 2020, Tourism Geographies.

[7]  Mary Mostafanezhad Covid-19 is an unnatural disaster: Hope in revelatory moments of crisis , 2020, Tourism Geographies.

[8]  Szilvia Gyimóthy,et al.  The COVID-19 crisis as an opportunity for escaping the unsustainable global tourism path , 2020, Tourism Geographies.

[9]  Émilie Crossley Ecological grief generates desire for environmental healing in tourism after COVID-19 , 2020, Tourism Geographies.

[10]  Marisol B. Correia,et al.  Instagram as a Co-Creation Space for Tourist Destination Image-Building: Algarve and Costa del Sol Case Studies , 2020, Sustainability.

[11]  Jordan W. Smith,et al.  Exploring qualitative applications of social media data for place-based assessments in destination planning , 2019, Current Issues in Asian Tourism: Volume II.

[12]  Muchazondida Mkono,et al.  The future of animals in tourism recreation: Social media as spaces of collective moral reflexivity , 2019, Tourism Management Perspectives.

[13]  Heikki Karjaluoto,et al.  What drives travelers' adoption of user-generated content? A literature review , 2018, Tourism Management Perspectives.

[14]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Unethical use of wildlife in tourism: what's the problem, who is responsible, and what can be done? , 2017 .

[15]  Vanessa A Richardson,et al.  A review of wildlife ecotourism in Manaus, Brazil , 2017 .

[16]  S. Hoefle Multi-functionality, juxtaposition and conflict in the Central Amazon: will tourism contribute to rural livelihoods and save the rainforest? , 2016 .

[17]  Estela Marine-Roig,et al.  A detailed method for destination image analysis using user-generated content , 2016, J. Inf. Technol. Tour..

[18]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The Customer Isn't Always Right—Conservation and Animal Welfare Implications of the Increasing Demand for Wildlife Tourism , 2015, PloS one.

[19]  Susanna Curtin,et al.  Wildlife Tourism: Reconnecting People with Nature , 2014 .

[20]  S. Adamo,et al.  Defining and assessing animal pain , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  S. W. Litvin,et al.  Ecotourism , 2019, Dictionary of Geotourism.

[22]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Navigating Environmental Attitudes , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  R. Ballantyne,et al.  Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences , 2011 .

[24]  Susanna Curtin,et al.  Wildlife tourism: the intangible, psychological benefits of human–wildlife encounters , 2009 .

[25]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Tourists' Support for Conservation Messages and Sustainable Management Practices in Wildlife Tourism Experiences , 2009 .

[26]  G. Akehurst User generated content: the use of blogs for tourism organisations and tourism consumers , 2009 .

[27]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Global trends in emerging infectious diseases , 2008, Nature.

[28]  G. Kyle,et al.  Enduring leisure involvement: the importance of personal relationships , 2004 .

[29]  K. Higginbottom Wildlife tourism: an introduction , 2004 .

[30]  Clement A. Tisdell,et al.  Conservation and Economic Benefits of Wildlife-Based Marine Tourism: Sea Turtles and Whales as Case Studies , 2003 .

[31]  P. Reynolds,et al.  Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism , 2001 .

[32]  D. Scott,et al.  An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavioral involvement, commitment, and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. , 1997 .

[33]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[34]  Mark E. Slama,et al.  Selected Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics Associated with Purchasing Involvement , 1985 .

[35]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .