Use of power tilt systems in everyday life

Purpose. The goal of this study was to monitor and describe the use of power tilt systems in everyday life. Additionally, tilt measurements were used to determine if participants performed regular pressure reliefs. Methods. Wheelchair occupancy and seat position of 16 fulltime power wheelchair users were monitored regularly for 1–2 weeks. Daily wheelchair occupancy, typical position, time spent at different tilt angles, tilt frequency and pressure relieving tilt (PRT) frequency were described. Results. Participants used their tilt systems in many different ways, including subjects who typically sat at small (0–14°) tilt angles and subjects who typically sat at medium (15–29°) tilt angles. Few subjects tilted past 45°. Almost all subjects tilted throughout the day, with the median subject performing >3 tilts per hour of wheelchair occupancy. Despite the regular use, few subjects performed regular PRTs (median = 0.13/h) Conclusion. Differences in tilt-use illustrated the variability in function and activity among users, as well as the diverse benefits of a tilt system for different users. Further study into why subjects did not regularly achieve PRT magnitudes would be valuable to inform improved training, education and follow-up.

[1]  J. B. Reswick,et al.  Experience at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital With Devices and Techniques to Prevent Pressure Sores , 1976 .

[2]  Lynne Broderick,et al.  Patterns of recurrent pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury: identification of risk and protective factors 5 or more years after onset. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Analysis of sliding and pressure distribution during a repositioning of persons in a simulator chair , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  E. Druin,et al.  CHAPTER SEVEN – Intervention Principles and Position Changes , 2009 .

[5]  A Case Study Comparing Activity and Participation Measurement in Two Subjects , 2007 .

[6]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Use of GPS and Sensor-based Instrumentation as a Supplement to Self-Report in Studies of Activity and Participation , 2005 .

[7]  Chris Maurer,et al.  Monitoring Power Upright and Tilt-In-Space Wheelchair Use , 2006 .

[8]  D. Hobson Comparative effects of posture on pressure and shear at the body-seat interface. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  S. Burns,et al.  Seating pressures with conventional and dynamic wheelchair cushions in tetraplegia. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Powered Tilt/Recline Systems: Why and How Are They Used? , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[11]  C G Cayten,et al.  A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Characterization of power wheelchair use in the home and community. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  M. Kosiak,et al.  Etiology and pathology of ischemic ulcers. , 1959, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Physiologic effects and design considerations of tilt and recline wheelchairs , 1997 .

[15]  R. Bode,et al.  Medical complications during acute rehabilitation following spinal cord injury--current experience of the Model Systems. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Chamberlain,et al.  Prevalence of pressure sores in a community sample of spinal injury patients , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  Bar Ca The response of tissues to applied pressure. , 1988 .