A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Intervention Aimed at Improving Food Purchasing Behavior: The Front-of-Pack Food Labels Impact on Consumer Choice Study

Background Most food in the United Kingdom is purchased in supermarkets, and many of these purchases are routinely tracked through supermarket loyalty card data. Using such data may be an effective way to develop remote public health interventions and to measure objectively their effectiveness at changing food purchasing behavior. Objective The Front-of-pack food Labels: Impact on Consumer Choice (FLICC) study is a pilot randomized controlled trial of a digital behavior change intervention. This pilot trial aimed to collect data on recruitment and retention rates and to provide estimates of effect sizes for the primary outcome (healthiness of ready meals and pizzas purchased) to inform a larger trial. Methods The intervention consisted of a website where participants could access tailored feedback on previous purchases of ready meals and pizzas, set goals for behavior change, and model and practice the recommended healthy shopping behavior using traffic light labels. The control consisted of Web-based information on traffic light labeling. Participants were recruited via email from a list of loyalty card holders held by the participating supermarket. All food and drink purchases for the participants for the 6 months before recruitment, during the 6-week intervention period, and during a 12-week washout period were transferred to the research team by the participating supermarket. Healthiness of ready meals and pizzas was measured using a predeveloped scale based solely on the traffic light colors on the foods. Questionnaires were completed at recruitment, end of the intervention, and end of washout to estimate the effect of the intervention on variables that mediate behavior change (eg, belief and intention formation). Results We recruited 496 participants from an initial email to 50,000 people. Only 3 people withdrew from the study, and purchase data were received for all other participants. A total of 208 participants completed all 3 questionnaires. There was no difference in the healthiness of purchased ready meals and pizzas between the intervention and control arms either during the intervention period (P=.32) or at washout (P=.59). Conclusions Although the FLICC study did not find evidence of an impact of the intervention on food purchasing behavior, the unique methods used in this pilot trial are informative for future studies that plan to use supermarket loyalty card data in collaboration with supermarket partners. The experience of the trial showcases the possibilities and challenges associated with the use of loyalty card data in public health research. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN19316955; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN19316955 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76IVZ9WjK) International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1186/s40814-015-0015-1

[1]  Peter Scarborough,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of remotely delivered interventions using self-monitoring or tailored feedback to change dietary behavior , 2018, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[2]  R. Doughty,et al.  A salt-reduction smartphone app supports lower-salt food purchases for people with cardiovascular disease: Findings from the SaltSwitch randomised controlled trial , 2017, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[3]  G. Cowburn The front of pack nutrition information panel : using novel methods to explore consumer decision making at point of choice during routine supermarket shopping , 2016 .

[4]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Reds are more important than greens: how UK supermarket shoppers use the different information on a traffic light nutrition label in a choice experiment , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[5]  Ronan A Lyons,et al.  Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, The Lancet.

[6]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase the use of traffic light food labelling in UK shoppers (the FLICC trial) , 2015, Pilot and Feasibility Studies.

[7]  K. Ball,et al.  Influence of price discounts and skill-building strategies on purchase and consumption of healthy food and beverages: outcomes of the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life randomized controlled trial. , 2015, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Big data meets public health , 2014, Science.

[9]  Katy Tapper,et al.  Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Internet-Based Healthy Eating Program: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  S. Michie,et al.  Does Brief Telephone Support Improve Engagement With a Web-Based Weight Management Intervention? Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  S. Mohan,et al.  Monitoring the levels of important nutrients in the food supply , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[12]  N. D. de Vries,et al.  Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  K. Ball,et al.  ShopSmart 4 Health – Protocol of a skills-based randomised controlled trial promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among socioeconomically disadvantaged women , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[14]  Matthias Briel,et al.  Inconsistent Definitions for Intention-To-Treat in Relation to Missing Outcome Data: Systematic Review of the Methods Literature , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  S. Kelders,et al.  Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  K. Brown,et al.  Changing micronutrient intake through (voluntary) behaviour change. The case of folate , 2012, Appetite.

[17]  Nanette Mutrie,et al.  Recruiting participants to walking intervention studies: a systematic review , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[18]  W. Kroeze,et al.  Which Intervention Characteristics are Related to More Exposure to Internet-Delivered Healthy Lifestyle Promotion Interventions? A Systematic Review , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[19]  Mick P Couper,et al.  Engagement and Retention: Measuring Breadth and Depth of Participant Use of an Online Intervention , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  M. Raats,et al.  Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey , 2010, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[21]  Tony Blakely,et al.  Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[22]  Gwen L. Alexander,et al.  A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[23]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Digital disease detection--harnessing the Web for public health surveillance. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  B. Swinburn,et al.  Impact of front-of-pack 'traffic-light' nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. , 2009, Health promotion international.

[25]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels , 2007, Journal of Public Health.

[26]  Gareth Denyer,et al.  The Effects on Saturated Fat Purchases of Providing Internet Shoppers with Purchase- Specific Dietary Advice: A Randomised Trial , 2006, PLoS clinical trials.

[27]  J. Rowley Building brand webs: customer relationship management through the Tesco clubcard loyalty scheme , 2005 .

[28]  G. Cowburn,et al.  Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. , 2005 .

[29]  C. Abraham,et al.  Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[30]  T. Graeff,et al.  Collecting and using personal data: consumers’ awareness and concerns , 2002 .

[31]  D. Altman,et al.  Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  K. Roininen,et al.  Quantification of Consumer Attitudes to Health and Hedonic Characteristics of Foods , 1999, Appetite.

[33]  R Shepherd,et al.  The effects of providing personalized dietary feedback. A semi-computerized approach. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[34]  P M Sandman,et al.  A model of the precaution adoption process: evidence from home radon testing. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.