Research, part of a Special Feature on Effects of Roads and Traffic on Wildlife Populations and Landscape Function Impacts of Traffic Noise and Traffic Volume on Birds of Roadside Habitats

Roadside habitats are important for a range of taxa including plants, insects, mammals, and birds, particularly in developed countries in which large expanses of native vegetation have been cleared for agriculture or urban development. Although roadside vegetation may provide suitable habitat for many species, resident animals can be exposed to high levels of traffic noise, visual disturbance from passing vehicles, and the risk of collision with cars and trucks. Traffic noise can reduce the distance over which acoustic signals such as song can be detected, an effect known as acoustic interference or masking. Studies from the northern hemisphere show that the singing behavior of birds changes in the presence of traffic noise. We investigated the impact of traffic noise and traffic volume on two species of birds, the Grey Shrike-thrush (Colluricincla harmonica) and the Grey Fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa), at 58 roadside sites on the Mornington Peninsula, southeastern Australia. The lower singing Grey Shrike-thrush sang at a higher frequency in the presence of traffic noise, with a predicted increase in dominant frequency of 5.8 Hz/dB of traffic noise, and a total effect size of 209 Hz. In contrast, the higher singing Grey Fantail did not appear to change its song in traffic noise. The probability of detecting each species on a visit to a site declined substantially with increasing traffic noise and traffic volume, with several lines of evidence supporting a larger effect of traffic noise. Traffic noise could hamper detection of song by conspecifics, making it more difficult for birds to establish and maintain territories, attract mates and maintain pair bonds, and possibly leading to reduced breeding success in noisy roadside habitats. Closing key roads during the breeding season is a potential, but untested, management strategy to protect threatened bird species from traffic noise and collision with vehicles at the time of year when they are most vulnerable to their impacts. Other management options include reducing the speed and/or volume of traffic on such roads to an acceptably low level. Ours is the first study to investigate the effect of traffic noise on the singing behavior of birds in the southern hemisphere.

[1]  S. Saarnio,et al.  Butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: Does road type affect diversity and abundance? , 2005 .

[2]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[3]  Mark J. Antos,et al.  Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation , 2005 .

[4]  C. Catterall,et al.  BUSHLAND MODIFICATION AND STYLES OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT : THEIR EFFECTS ON BIRDS IN SOUTH-EAST QUEENSLAND , 1998 .

[5]  H. Brumm City birds have changed their tune , 2006 .

[6]  M. Munguira,et al.  Use of Road Verges by Butterfly and Burnet Populations, and the Effect of Roads on Adult Dispersal and Mortality , 1992 .

[7]  H. Hake,et al.  On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory Stimulus , 1950 .

[8]  Neil Thomason,et al.  Impact of Criticism of Null‐Hypothesis Significance Testing on Statistical Reporting Practices in Conservation Biology , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  E. Fernández-Juricic,et al.  LOCAL AND REGIONAL EFFECTS OF PEDESTRIANS ON FOREST BIRDS IN A FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE , 2000 .

[10]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  S. Collins,et al.  Chapter 2 – Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong , 2004 .

[12]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[13]  Anna M. Hersperger,et al.  Road Traffic and Nearby Grassland Bird Patterns in a Suburbanizing Landscape , 2002, Environmental management.

[14]  James S. Clark,et al.  Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians , 2004 .

[15]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[17]  Henrike Hultsch,et al.  Chapter 3 – Learning to sing , 2004 .

[18]  J. Swaddle,et al.  High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches: implications for noise pollution , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  P. Warren,et al.  Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  M. McCarthy Bayesian Methods for Ecology: Frontmatter , 2007 .

[21]  Tallgrass prairie management and bird nest success along roadsides , 2005 .

[22]  Douglas H. Johnson The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing , 1999 .

[23]  D. Watson,et al.  Breeding biology of the Grey Shrike-thrush (Colluricincla harmonica) , 2005 .

[24]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. Ill. Reduction of density in relation to the proximity of main roads , 1995 .

[25]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[26]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The effects of traffic on the density of breeding birds in Dutch agricultural grasslands , 1996 .

[27]  G. C. Hickman,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF ROOST SITES USED BY BURROWING OWLS (ATHENE CUNICULARIA) WINTERING IN SOUTHERN TEXAS , 2007 .

[28]  Jane Elith,et al.  Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: A review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW , 2005 .

[29]  T. Simons,et al.  EFFECTS OF HUMAN RECREATION ON THE INCUBATION BEHAVIOR OF AMERICAN OYSTERCATCHERS , 2006 .

[30]  F. Rheindt The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? , 2003 .

[31]  A. Bennett,et al.  Nest-tree selection by the threatened brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in a highly fragmented agricultural landscape , 2006 .

[32]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative , 2000 .

[33]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The Effects of Car Traffic on Breeding Bird Populations in Woodland. I. Evidence of Reduced Habitat Quality for Willow Warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) Breeding Close to a Highway , 1994 .

[34]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[35]  K. Gaston,et al.  Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins , 2007, Biology Letters.

[36]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[37]  W. E. Wood,et al.  SONG SPARROW (MELOSPIZA MELODIA) SONG VARIES WITH URBAN NOISE , 2006 .

[38]  P. Warren,et al.  Tits, noise and urban bioacoustics. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT , 2006 .

[40]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Habitat type determines the effects of disturbance on the breeding productivity of the Dartford Warbler Sylvia undata , 2007 .

[41]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[42]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla , 2006 .

[43]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[44]  A. Horn,et al.  Ambient noise and the design of begging signals , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  T. Sparks,et al.  Road verges as habitat for small mammals in Britain , 2000 .

[46]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  ROADS, ROADSIDES AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: A REVIEW , 1991 .

[47]  R. Dooling,et al.  Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  J. Hilty Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation , 2006 .

[49]  M. Goosem Fragmentation impacts caused by roads through rainforests , 2007 .

[50]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Spatial patterns and factors influencing small vertebrate fauna road-kill aggregations , 2003 .

[52]  Katharina Tluk von Toschanowitz,et al.  Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: An interactive model of road avoidance behavior , 2005 .

[53]  Glen E. Woolfenden,et al.  Life and Death in the Fast Lane: Demographic Consequences of Road Mortality in the Florida Scrub‐Jay , 2000 .

[54]  P. Marler Chapter 5 – Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication , 2004 .

[55]  F Goller,et al.  The metabolic cost of birdsong production. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[56]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[57]  J. Way ROADSIDE VERGES AND CONSERVATION IN BRITAIN: A REVIEW , 1977 .

[58]  A. D. Geis,et al.  EFFECTS OF ROADS ON SMALL MAMMALS , 1983 .

[59]  D. Bamber The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph , 1975 .

[60]  J. Ford Evolution, Distribution and Stage of Speciation in the Rhipidura fuliginosa complex in Australia , 1981 .

[61]  John G. White,et al.  Birds of remnant vegetation on the Mornington Peninsula, Victoria, Australia: the role of interiors, edges and roadsides , 2003 .

[62]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate , 2005 .

[63]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression , 2000 .

[64]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.