Automated Classification of Glandular Tissue by Statistical Proximity Sampling

Due to the complexity of biological tissue and variations in staining procedures, features that are based on the explicit extraction of properties from subglandular structures in tissue images may have difficulty generalizing well over an unrestricted set of images and staining variations. We circumvent this problem by an implicit representation that is both robust and highly descriptive, especially when combined with a multiple instance learning approach to image classification. The new feature method is able to describe tissue architecture based on glandular structure. It is based on statistically representing the relative distribution of tissue components around lumen regions, while preserving spatial and quantitative information, as a basis for diagnosing and analyzing different areas within an image. We demonstrate the efficacy of the method in extracting discriminative features for obtaining high classification rates for tubular formation in both healthy and cancerous tissue, which is an important component in Gleason and tubule-based Elston grading. The proposed method may be used for glandular classification, also in other tissue types, in addition to general applicability as a region-based feature descriptor in image analysis where the image represents a bag with a certain label (or grade) and the region-based feature vectors represent instances.

[1]  S. C. Wu,et al.  An Application Of Pattern Recognition To Epithelial Tissues , 1978 .

[2]  S. Navani,et al.  The human protein atlas , 2011 .

[3]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[4]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[5]  Joakim Lindblad,et al.  Blind Color Decomposition of Histological Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Raymond Lister,et al.  Grand challenges , 2005, SGCS.

[7]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Solving the Multiple Instance Problem with Axis-Parallel Rectangles , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Frédéric Jurie,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Bag-of-Features Image Classification , 2006, ECCV.

[9]  L. V. Vliet,et al.  Curvature and Bending Energy in Digitized 2D and 3D Images , 1993 .

[10]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[11]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[12]  Daniel Racoceanu,et al.  Detection of Mitosis and Evaluation of Nuclear Atypia Score in Breast Cancer Histological Images , 2014 .

[13]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Automated prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of tissue microarrays , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Pattern Recognition, Fourth Edition , 2008 .

[15]  Robert P. W. Duin Non-Euclidean Problems in Pattern Recognition Related to Human Expert Knowledge , 2010, ICEIS.

[16]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[17]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Anders Hast,et al.  Image Segmentation and Identification of Paired Antibodies in Breast Tissue , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[19]  Wan-Jui Lee,et al.  Bag Dissimilarities for Multiple Instance Learning , 2011, SIMBAD.

[20]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  A Matlab Toolbox for Pattern Recognition , 2004 .

[21]  Harold W. Kuhn,et al.  The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[22]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Local Features and Kernels for Classification of Texture and Object Categories: A Comprehensive Study , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[23]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[24]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using spectral clustering with textural and architectural image features , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.