980-nm-pumped Er-doped LiNbO/sub 3/ waveguide amplifiers: a comparison with 1484-nm pumping

We have investigated by numerical modeling the relative efficacy of 980-nm and 1484-nm-pumped guided-wave optical amplifiers in Er-doped LiNbO/sub 3/. The shorter wavelength produces a larger differential gain, but the waveguide amplifier suffers from the photorefractive effect if no precautions are taken. Model calculations show that an optical gain of 2.5 dB/cm can be achieved at 80-mW 980-nm pump power, compared to 1.3 dB/cm when pumped at 1484 nm. Experimental results using 80 mW 980 nm give a gain of /spl sim/2.2 dB/cm (minus propagation loss). This gain, however, is degraded by photorefractive damage, which we find is not only due to the 980-nm pump light, but also to the green up-converted light, the latter having the larger effect. Several techniques were shown to reduce the photorefractive damage. ZnO indiffused waveguides in MgO-doped LiNbO/sub 3/ substrates proves to be the most effective. In bulk-doped Er:Mg:LiNbO/sub 3/ samples with ZnO waveguides, an optical gain of 1.6 dB/cm (minus propagation loss) was observed with 54 mW of out-coupled pump power.

[1]  Chi-Hung Huang,et al.  Er-indiffused Ti:LiNbO/sub 3/ channel waveguide optical amplifiers pumped at 980 nm , 1996 .

[2]  S. Novak,et al.  Correlation of substitutional hydrogen to refractive index profiles in annealed proton‐exchanged Z‐ and X‐cut LiNbO3 , 1995 .

[3]  I. Baumann,et al.  Erbium-doped single- and double-pass Ti:LiNbO/sub 3/ waveguide amplifiers , 1994 .

[4]  W. Sohler,et al.  Theoretical modeling of optical amplification in Er-doped Ti:LiNbO/sub 3/ waveguides , 1994 .

[5]  Leon McCaughan,et al.  Evaluation of absorption and emission cross sections of Er-doped LiNbO/sub 3/ for application to integrated optic amplifiers , 1994 .

[6]  H. Nishihara,et al.  Efficient laser oscillation in thermally Nd-diffused MgO:LiNbO3 singlemode waveguides , 1994 .

[7]  G. Betts,et al.  Effect of annealing on photorefractive damage in titanium-indiffused LiNbO/sub 3/ modulators , 1994, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[8]  R. Ramaswamy,et al.  Comparison of photorefractive index change in proton-exchanged and Ti-diffused LiNbO(3) waveguides. , 1993, Optics letters.

[9]  Robert S. Feigelson,et al.  Fabrication, characterization and index profile modeling of high-damage resistance Zn-diffused waveguides in congruent and MgO:lithium niobate , 1992 .

[10]  Leon McCaughan,et al.  Method for the local incorporation of Er into LiNbO3 guided wave optic devices by Ti co‐diffusion , 1992 .

[11]  H J Shaw,et al.  Photorefractive-damage-resistant Zn-diffused waveguides in MgO:LiNbO(3). , 1991, Optics letters.

[12]  Y. Tachikawa,et al.  Noise characteristics of Er/sup 3+/-doped fiber amplifiers pumped by 0.98 and 1.48 mu m laser diodes , 1990, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[13]  M. Horiguchi,et al.  Er/sup 3+/-doped fiber amplifier pumped by 0.98 mu m laser diodes , 1989, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[14]  R. Rue,et al.  Proton-exchanged LiNbO/sub 3/ waveguides: the effects of post-exchange annealing and buffered melts as determined by infrared spectroscopy, optical waveguide measurements, and hydrogen isotopic exchange reactions , 1989 .

[15]  S. Sato,et al.  Wavelength dependence of photorefractive effect in Ti‐indiffused LiNbO3 waveguides , 1989 .

[16]  Michel J. F. Digonnet,et al.  Nd:MgO:LiNbO 3 spectroscopy and laser devices , 1986 .

[17]  C. Bulmer Characteristics of Ti-indiffused waveguides in MgO-doped LiNbO3 , 1984 .

[18]  V. Gapontsev,et al.  Erbium glass lasers and their applications , 1982 .