How Molecular Competition Influences Fluxes in Gene Expression Networks

Often, in living cells different molecular species compete for binding to the same molecular target. Typical examples are the competition of genes for the transcription machinery or the competition of mRNAs for the translation machinery. Here we show that such systems have specific regulatory features and how they can be analysed. We derive a theory for molecular competition in parallel reaction networks. Analytical expressions for the response of network fluxes to changes in the total competitor and common target pools indicate the precise conditions for ultrasensitivity and intuitive rules for competitor strength. The calculations are based on measurable concentrations of the competitor-target complexes. We show that kinetic parameters, which are usually tedious to determine, are not required in the calculations. Given their simplicity, the obtained equations are easily applied to networks of any dimension. The new theory is illustrated for competing sigma factors in bacterial transcription and for a genome-wide network of yeast mRNAs competing for ribosomes. We conclude that molecular competition can drastically influence the network fluxes and lead to negative response coefficients and ultrasensitivity. Competitors that bind a large fraction of the target, like bacterial σ70, tend to influence competing pathways strongly. The less a competitor is saturated by the target, the more sensitive it is to changes in the concentration of the target, as well as to other competitors. As a consequence, most of the mRNAs in yeast turn out to respond ultrasensitively to changes in ribosome concentration. Finally, applying the theory to a genome-wide dataset we observe that high and low response mRNAs exhibit distinct Gene Ontology profiles.

[1]  C. Kurland,et al.  The distribution of soluble and ribosomal RNA as a function of growth rate , 1963 .

[2]  H. Kazazian,et al.  The characterization of separated alpha and beta-chain polyribosomes in rabbit reticulocytes. , 1968, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[4]  J. Rose Nucleotide sequences of ribosome recgonition sites in messenger RNAs of vesicular stomatitis virus. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  O. Maaløe,et al.  Regulation of the Protein-Synthesizing Machinery—Ribosomes, tRNA, Factors, and So On , 1979 .

[6]  R Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical modelling of translation of mRNA in eucaryotes; steady state, time-dependent processes and application to reticulocytes. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D E Koshland,et al.  Sensitivity amplification in biochemical systems , 1982, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[9]  Keith R. Yamamoto,et al.  Biological Regulation and Development , 1982, Springer US.

[10]  D E Koshland,et al.  The branch point effect. Ultrasensitivity and subsensitivity to metabolic control. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  H. Kacser,et al.  Metabolic control analysis of moiety-conserved cycles. , 1986, European journal of biochemistry.

[12]  A. Goldfarb,et al.  Competition between sigma factors for core RNA polymerase. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  C Reder,et al.  Metabolic control theory: a structural approach. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  K. Jensen,et al.  Metabolic growth rate control in Escherichia coli may be a consequence of subsaturation of the macromolecular biosynthetic apparatus with substrates and catalytic components. , 1990, Microbiological reviews.

[15]  J. Helmann Alternative sigma factors and the regulation of flagellar gene expression , 1991, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  D A Siegele,et al.  Microbial competition: Escherichia coli mutants that take over stationary phase cultures. , 1993, Science.

[17]  M. Merrick In a class of its own--the RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma 54 (sigma N). , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  H. Sauro Moiety-conserved cycles and metabolic control analysis: problems in sequestration and metabolic channelling. , 1994, Bio Systems.

[19]  H. Sauro,et al.  Control by enzymes, coenzymes and conserved moieties. A generalisation of the connectivity theorem of metabolic control analysis. , 1994, European journal of biochemistry.

[20]  H. Sauro,et al.  Control by enzymes, coenzymes and conserved moieties , 1994 .

[21]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[22]  P. Matsumura,et al.  Differential regulation of multiple overlapping promoters in flagellar class II operons in Escherichia coli , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[23]  S. Ueda,et al.  Regulation of RNA polymerase sigma subunit synthesis in Escherichia coli: intracellular levels of four species of sigma subunit under various growth conditions , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  V. Shingler Signal sensing by σ54‐dependent regulators: derepression as a control mechanism , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  D. Fell Understanding the Control of Metabolism , 1996 .

[26]  T. Nyström,et al.  Negative regulation by RpoS: a case of sigma factor competition , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  J. Warner,et al.  The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[28]  A. Ishihama Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. , 2000, Annual review of microbiology.

[29]  N. Fujita,et al.  Competition among seven Escherichia coli sigma subunits: relative binding affinities to the core RNA polymerase. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  K. Krogfelt,et al.  rpoS Gene Function Is a Disadvantage forEscherichia coli BJ4 during Competitive Colonization of the Mouse Large Intestine , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[31]  P. Mitchell,et al.  mRNA turnover. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[32]  J. Warner,et al.  Economics of ribosome biosynthesis. , 2001, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[33]  T. Nyström,et al.  Regulation of sigma factor competition by the alarmone ppGpp. , 2002, Genes & development.

[34]  T. Ferenci,et al.  rpoS Mutations and Loss of General Stress Resistance in Escherichia coli Populations as a Consequence of Conflict between Competing Stress Responses , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[35]  A. Ishihama,et al.  Growth Phase-Coupled Alterations in Cell Structure and Function of Escherichia coli , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[37]  John D. Storey,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Gene Expression Analyzed by High-resolution State Array Analysis and Quantitative Proteomics , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[39]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Control of rRNA Synthesis in Escherichia coli: a Systems Biology Approach , 2004, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[40]  T. Nyström MicroReview: Growth versus maintenance: a trade‐off dictated by RNA polymerase availability and sigma factor competition? , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[41]  A. Ishihama,et al.  Biosynthesis of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[42]  S. Darst,et al.  Sigma and RNA polymerase: an on-again, off-again relationship? , 2005, Molecular cell.

[43]  Vassily Hatzimanikatis,et al.  An algorithmic framework for genome-wide modeling and analysis of translation networks. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[44]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Rate, accuracy and cost of ribosomes in bacterial cells. , 2006, Biochimie.

[45]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Effects of sequestration on signal transduction cascades , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[46]  J. Neefjes,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[47]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Proteome analysis of yeast response to various nutrient limitations , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[48]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Substrate Competition as a Source of Ultrasensitivity in the Inactivation of Wee1 , 2007, Cell.

[49]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[50]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Andreas Beyer,et al.  Posttranscriptional Expression Regulation: What Determines Translation Rates? , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  H. Schellhorn,et al.  Control of RpoS in global gene expression of Escherichia coli in minimal media , 2008, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[53]  F. Bruggeman,et al.  Elongation dynamics shape bursty transcription and translation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Melissa J. Moore,et al.  Pre-mRNA Processing Reaches Back toTranscription and Ahead to Translation , 2009, Cell.

[55]  H. Schellhorn,et al.  Global effect of RpoS on gene expression in pathogenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL933 , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[56]  Piotr Zielenkiewicz,et al.  A Comprehensive, Quantitative, and Genome-Wide Model of Translation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[57]  F J Bruggeman,et al.  Origins of stochastic intracellular processes and consequences for cell-to-cell variability and cellular survival strategies. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[58]  H. Schellhorn,et al.  Antagonistic regulation of motility and transcriptome expression by RpoN and RpoS in Escherichia coli , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[59]  Marlena Siwiak,et al.  A comprehensive, quantitative, and genome-wide model of translation , 2013 .