Modularity, Retroactivity, and Structural Identification

Many reverse-engineering techniques in systems biology rely upon data on steady-state (or dynamic) perturbations – obtained from siRNA, gene knock-down or overexpression, kinase and phosphatase inhibitors, or other interventions – in order to understand the interactions between different ‘modules’ in a network. This paper first reviews one popular such technique, introduced by the author and collaborators, and also discusses why conclusions drawn from its (mis-)use may be misleading due to ‘retroactivity’ (impedance or load) effects. A theoretical result characterizing stoichiometric-induced steady-state retroactivity effects is given for a class of biochemical networks.

[1]  Piotr Berman,et al.  Algorithmic Issues in Reverse Engineering of Protein and Gene Networks via the Modular Response Analysis Method , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Eduardo D. Sontag Structure and stability of certain chemical networks and applications to the kinetic proofreading model of T-cell receptor signal transduction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[4]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Inferring dynamic architecture of cellular networks using time series of gene expression, protein and metabolite data , 2004, Bioinform..

[5]  M. Feinberg Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors—I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems , 1987 .

[6]  P. McSharry,et al.  Mathematical and computational techniques to deduce complex biochemical reaction mechanisms. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[7]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[8]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Inference of signaling and gene regulatory networks by steady-state perturbation experiments: structure and accuracy. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Piotr Berman,et al.  Randomized approximation algorithms for set multicover problems with applications to reverse engineering of protein and gene networks , 2007, Discret. Appl. Math..

[11]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Determination of Functional Network Structure from Local Parameter Dependence Data , 2002, physics/0205003.

[12]  R. Callard,et al.  From the top down: towards a predictive biology of signalling networks. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[13]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Dissecting the puzzle of life: modularization of signal transduction networks , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..