The use of virtual microscopy for proficiency testing in gynecologic cytopathology: a feasibility study using ScanScope.

CONTEXT ScanScope software can digitize entire cytology slides. OBJECTIVE To test the feasibility of using virtual microscopy methods and "virtual Papanicolaou tests" for proficiency testing (PT) in gynecologic cytopathology. DESIGN Two PT exercises were conducted using virtual microscopy. Five cytopathologists and 1 cytotechnologist interpreted images using 2 different schema as follows: (1) the College of American Pathologists graded diagnostic codes (CAP-GDCs) and (2) the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services test scoring categories (CMS-TSCs). The number of diagnostic errors using the CAP-GDCs and the CMS-TSCs, the mean length of time spent diagnosing each case, and the impressions by the users regarding the facility of the technology and image quality were studied. RESULTS In the first PT exercise, the participants provided incorrect diagnoses in 4 to 8 of the 10 test cases using the CAP-GDCs and in 1 to 4 of the 10 test cases using the CMS-TSCs. In the second PT exercise, the number of errors decreased to 1 to 6 using the CAP-GDCs and to 0 to 6 using the CMS-TSCs. The results did not achieve statistical significance. The mean time of 9.4 minutes spent per case in the second PT exercise was significantly shorter than the 14.4 minutes spent per case in the first PT exercise (P < .001). The ease of use of the software and the image quality were scored by all participants as 3+ or as 4+. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary study shows that virtual microscopy and virtual Papanicolaou tests prepared using ScanScope may provide effective tools for PT. Technical issues that require further investigation are discussed.

[1]  Proficiency testing in cytology in New York. Analysis of a 14-year state program. , 1986, Acta cytologica.

[2]  Collins Dn,et al.  Proficiency testing in cytology in New York. Analysis of a 14-year state program. , 1986 .

[3]  Proficiency testing in cytology laboratories in Ontario, Canada: a decade of experience. II. Results of initial surveys. , 1987, Acta cytologica.

[4]  Proficiency testing in cytology laboratories in Ontario, Canada: a decade of experience. I. Introduction and description of the testing model. , 1987, Acta cytologica.

[5]  G. Massarella,et al.  Proficiency testing in cytology laboratories in Ontario, Canada: a decade of experience. III. A precision study of consistency and reproducibility in cytology reporting. , 1987, Acta cytologica.

[6]  Cytopathology: new legislative, regulatory, and proficiency testing requirements. , 1989, Maryland medical journal.

[7]  Cytopathology: new legislative, regulatory, and proficiency testing requirements. , 1989 .

[8]  Quality assurance in cytology: New York State Proficiency Testing Program. , 1989, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[9]  Can cytology proficiency testing programs discriminate between competent and incompetent practitioners? , 1991, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[10]  Cytology proficiency testing has stumped experts. , 1993, JAMA.

[11]  D. Coleman,et al.  Quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: results of a proficiency testing scheme for cytology laboratories in the north west Thames region. , 1994, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[12]  D. Coleman,et al.  Quality assurance in cervical cancer screening , 1994 .

[13]  Government mandated cytology proficiency testing: Time for reality testing , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[14]  Gynecologic cytology from the perspective of the Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program, Ontario, Canada. , 1995, Acta cytologica.

[15]  Proficiency testing in cytology—does it have any value? , 1995, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[16]  The cytology proficiency dilemma: the case for computer-based testing. , 1996, American clinical laboratory.

[17]  Quarngesser Ss.  The cytology proficiency dilemma: the case for computer-based testing. , 1996 .

[18]  Cytopathology laboratory improvement programs of the College of American Pathologists: Laboratory Accreditation Program (CAP LAP) and Performance Improvement Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (CAP PAP). , 1997, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[19]  A. Herbert.  Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient? , 1997, Journal of clinical pathology.

[20]  Certification, licensing, accreditation, and proficiency testing in cytopathology: Let there be light! , 1998, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[21]  Diane D. Davey,et al.  Computerized Training and Proficiency Testing , 1998, Acta Cytologica.

[22]  CLIA program; simplifying CLIA regulations relating to accreditation, exemption of laboratories under a state licensure program, proficiency testing, and inspection--HCFA. Final rule. , 1998, Federal register.

[23]  A M Marchevsky,et al.  Virtual microscopy: high resolution digital photomicrography as a tool for light microscopy simulation. , 1999, Human pathology.

[24]  A M Marchevsky,et al.  "Virtual microscopy" and the internet as telepathology consultation tools: diagnostic accuracy in evaluating melanocytic skin lesions. , 1999, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[25]  A M Marchevsky,et al.  Virtual microscopy and public-key cryptography for Internet telepathology , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  R P Singson,et al.  Virtual microscopy and the Internet as telepathology consultation tools. A study of gastrointestinal biopsy specimens. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[27]  R N Taylor,et al.  CytoView. A prototype computer image-based Papanicolaou smear proficiency test. , 1999, Acta cytologica.

[28]  Regarding the validity of cytology proficiency testing , 2000, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[29]  Syed Z. Ali,et al.  Application of virtual microscopy in clinical cytopathology , 2001, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[30]  Alberto M Marchevsky,et al.  Virtual microscopy as a tool for proficiency testing in cytopathology: a model using multiple digital images of Papanicolaou tests. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[31]  Measuring the significance of field validation in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology: how good are the experts? , 2005, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[32]  A. Hackshaw,et al.  Using and understanding medical statistics , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.