Saturation in a wide-field, directionally selective movement detection system in fly vision

In the third optic lobe of the fly large-field spiking neurons are found which detect movement in a directionally selective way. For a wide variety of stimuli the responses of one of these, the H1 neuron, can very well be described and predicted by Reichardt's correlation model which is based on behavioural optomoter responses. However, when the spike rate is driven to large values with intense stimuli, the correlation model needs to be extended in order to account for the saturation phenomena that occur. Saturation can take place in all the elements of the large and extensive movement detecting system which contains interneurons in the optic lobes which process and guide the signals from the peripheral receptors to the central H1 neuron. To separate saturation at the peripheral site from that at the central level of the H1 neuron, a special stimulation technique was chosen. In measuring the saturation at the central level the stimulus parameter was the size of the stimulus field, while the modulation depth of the moving grating in this field stayed constant. Saturation at the peripheral site of the system was studied with a stimulus in which the modulation depth of the moving grating was the parameter and the size of the stimulus field was small and constant. When a simple feedback loop is incorporated in the final stage of the correlation model the saturation phenomena at the central level for steady-state stimulus conditions can very well be described. Saturation phenomena at the peripheral site of the system can also be explained by the same kind of feedback mechanisms in the input channels.

[1]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part I. A quantitative analysis , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[2]  Gilbert D. McCann,et al.  Spectral and Polarization Sensitivity of the Dipteran Visual System , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  Willem Hendrik Zaagman,et al.  Some characteristics of the neural activity of directionally selective movement detectors in the visual system of the blowfly , 1977 .

[4]  W. Reichardt Movement perception in insects , 1969 .

[5]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the flies Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Nicolas Franceschini,et al.  Sampling of the Visual Environment by the Compound Eye of the Fly: Fundamentals and Applications , 1975 .

[7]  B. Hassenstein,et al.  Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus , 1956 .

[8]  Hendrikus Arnoldus Klaas Mastebroek,et al.  Stochastic structure of neural activity in the visual system of the blowfly , 1974 .

[9]  W. Reichardt Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems , 1957 .

[10]  N. Strausfeld Atlas of an Insect Brain , 1976, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[11]  Robert R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  Adaptive strategies in fly vision: On their image-processing qualities , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part II. Towards the underlying neural interactions , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[13]  H. A. K. Mastebroek,et al.  Movement detection: Performance of a wide-field element in the visual system of the blowfly , 1980, Vision Research.