Orangutans Modify Their Gestural Signaling According to Their Audience's Comprehension

When people are not fully understood, they persist with attempts to communicate, elaborating their speech in order to better convey their meaning [1]. We investigated whether captive orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii) would use analogous communicative strategies in signaling to a human experimenter, and whether they could distinguish different degrees of misunderstanding. Orangutans' behavior varied according to how well they had apparently been understood. When their aims were not met, they persisted in communicative attempts. However, when the interlocutor appeared partially to understand their meaning, orangutans narrowed down their range of signals, focusing on gestures already used and repeating them frequently. In contrast, when completely misunderstood, orangutans elaborated their range of gestures, avoiding repetition of failed signals. It is therefore possible, from communicative signals alone, to determine how well an orangutan's intended goal has been met. This differentiation might function under natural conditions to allow an orangutan's intended goals to be understood more efficiently. In the absence of conventional labels, communicating the fact that an intention has been somewhat misunderstood is an important way to establish shared meaning.

[1]  R. Golinkoff When is communication a ‘meeting of minds’? , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[2]  J. Gavin Bremner,et al.  Blackwell handbook of infant development , 2004 .

[3]  P. Comoglio,et al.  To move or not to move? , 2004 .

[4]  S. Shettleworth Animal cognition and animal behaviour , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Roberta Michnick Golinkoff 'I beg your pardon?': the preverbal negotiation of failed messages. , 1986 .

[6]  W. Hopkins,et al.  Differential use of attentional and visual communicative signaling by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in response to the attentional status of a human , 2006, American journal of primatology.

[7]  B. Balleine,et al.  Motivational control of goal-directed action , 1994 .

[8]  E. Markman,et al.  Young children's appreciation of the mental impact of their communicative signals. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[9]  E. Bates The Emergence Of Symbols , 1979 .

[10]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  ‘I beg your pardon?’: the preverbal negotiation of failed messages , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  S. Roberts,et al.  Isolation of an internal clock. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  D. McFarland,et al.  Intelligent behavior in animals and robots , 1993 .

[13]  David A. Leavens,et al.  Intentionality as measured in the persistence and elaboration of communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2005, Child development.

[14]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Gestural communication of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) , 2006 .

[15]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  To move or not to move: How apes adjust to the attentional state of others , 2004 .

[16]  Robert L. Boughner,et al.  Reexamining the frustration effect in rats: Aftereffects of surprising reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 2003 .