Contribution of immunocytochemistry in routine diagnostic cytology

The authors report the experience of applying immunocytochemistry in routine cytological examination and its contribution for diagnosis during a period of 3 yr in Veterans General Hospital‐Taipei, Taiwan. From August 1991 to July 1994, the cytology laboratory received 5,762 non‐gynecologic specimens with urine excluded. Immunocytochemistry was performed selectively in problematic cases. A total of 215 stainings including 124 epithelial markers, 50 lymphoma/leukemia markers, 22 neuroglial and choroid plexus markers, seven mesenchymal markers, six melanoma markers, and six others was performed on 145 specimens consisting of 89 effusions, 28 fine‐needle aspirations, 11 cerebrospinal fluids, and 17 other specimens. Effusions were by far the most frequent specimens for immunocytochemistry and the epithelial markers were the most frequently used antibodies. The immunocytochemical results were essential in 41 specimens (28%), confirmatory in 37 (26%), and non‐contributory in 67 (46%). Essential and confirmatory results occurred in 49% of effusions (44/89), 71% of fine‐needle aspirations (20/28), 55% of cerebrospinal fluids (6/11), and 47% of other specimens (8/17). It is concluded that immunocytochemistry is proved to be a good aid for the final diagnosis of daily cytologic practices in which the fine‐needle aspiration specimens are benefitted best. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:221–225. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Silverman,et al.  Immunocytochemical panel for the identification of malignant cells in serous effusions. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  H. Battifora,et al.  Immunocytochemical profile of benign and carcinomatous effusions. A practical approach to difficult diagnosis. , 1990, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  C. Cohen,et al.  Distinction between carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Usefulness of immunohistochemistry. , 1990, Acta cytologica.

[4]  C. Meijer,et al.  The contribution of immunocytochemistry in diagnostic cytology. Comparison and evaluation with immunohistology , 1990, Cancer.

[5]  Pettigrew Nm Techniques in immunocytochemistry. Application to diagnostic pathology. , 1989 .

[6]  N. Sneige,et al.  Use of monoclonal antibody HMB-45 in the cytologic diagnosis of melanoma. , 1988, Acta cytologica.

[7]  J. Said,et al.  Cytodiagnosis of malignant melanoma. Immunoperoxidase staining with HMB-45 antibody as an aid to diagnosis. , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  T. Kotani,et al.  Application of the avidin-biotin-complex method for the light microscopic analysis of lymphocyte subsets with monoclonal antibodies on air-dried smears. , 1988, Acta cytologica.

[9]  Travis Wd,et al.  Immunoperoxidase staining of fine needle aspiration specimens previously stained by the Papanicolaou technique. , 1987 .

[10]  J. Silverman,et al.  The use of immunoperoxidase panels for the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy in serous effusions , 1987, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[11]  A. Thor,et al.  Applications of immunocytochemistry to clinical cytology. , 1987, Cancer investigation.

[12]  E. Schon,et al.  Transthyretin , 1986, Neurology.

[13]  H. Battifora,et al.  Antigenic phenotype of malignant mesotheliomas and pulmonary adenocarcinomas. An immunohistologic analysis demonstrating the value of Leu M1 antigen. , 1986, The American journal of pathology.

[14]  S. Hajdu,et al.  The role of immunoperoxidase staining in diagnostic cytology. , 1986, Acta cytologica.

[15]  M. Nadji The potential value of immunoperoxidase techniques in diagnostic cytology. , 1980, Acta cytologica.