A spatiotemporal individual-based fish model to investigate emergent properties at the organismal and the population level

A spatiotemporal individual-based model (IBM) of roach (Rutilus rutilus) including bioenergetic principles was used to study emergent properties at the individual and the population level which appeared as a result of resource allocation and time scheduling of activities related to maintenance, growth, and reproduction in a seasonally changing environment. The model was used as a virtual laboratory to consider the impact of various parameters on vital rates and spatial behaviour of roach, which is particularly difficult to study in the field. The parameterisation based on field studies performed at Lake Belau (Schleswig-Holstein, Germany) and laboratory measurements. This allowed us to explore the relationship between population structure and environmental heterogeneity on an integrated base. At the individual level emergent properties such as spatial behaviour, growth, and food consumption could be identified. Emergent properties at the population level resulted as phenotypic consequences of a trophic bottleneck, the influence of lake morphology on the phenotype as well as size-dependent winter mortality rates and post-reproductive mortality rates.

[1]  W. Wieser,et al.  Aerobic maximum for growth in the larvae and juveniles of a cyprinid fish, Rutilus rutilus (L.): implications for energy budgeting in small poikilotherms , 1990 .

[2]  P. Henderson,et al.  Size-selective overwintering mortality in the sand smelt, Atherina boyeri Risso, and its role in population regulation , 1988 .

[3]  Neil A A Macfarlane,et al.  The induced spawning of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), with the antioestrogens clomiphene and tamoxifen , 1983 .

[4]  B. Breckling,et al.  Emergent properties in individual-based ecological models—introducing case studies in an ecosystem research context , 2005 .

[5]  J. Krause,et al.  The social organization of fish shoals: a test of the predictive power of laboratory experiments for the field , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  T. Valtonen,et al.  Size-dependent over-winter mortality of young-of-the-year roach, Rutilus rutilus , 1997, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[7]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[8]  A. Temming,et al.  Diurnal Variations in Swimming Activity of Rutilus rutilus (Cyprinidae) in a Group under Tank Conditions , 1994 .

[9]  J. Craig Pike : biology and exploitation , 1996 .

[10]  Henriette I. Jager,et al.  Effects of climatic temperature change on growth, survival, and reproduction of rainbow trout: predictions from a simulation model , 1997 .

[11]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Handbook of fish biology and fisheries , 2002 .

[12]  R. Pierce,et al.  The Relationship of Bluegill Growth, Lake Morphometry, and Water Quality in Minnesota , 2001 .

[13]  W. Wieser Physiological energetics and ecophysiology , 1991 .

[14]  A. Sheldon,et al.  Selective mortality of post-spawning yellowfin shiners, Notropis lutipinnis (Pisces: Cyprinidae) , 1988 .

[15]  Robert J. Wootton,et al.  Ecology of Teleost Fishes , 1989, Springer Netherlands.

[16]  Simulation of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects induced by piscivorous predators , 2005 .

[17]  B. Breckling,et al.  Influence of activity in a heterogeneous environment on the dynamics of fish growth: an individual‐based model of roacl , 2002 .

[18]  L. Persson Effects of habitat and season on competitive interactions between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) , 1987, Oecologia.

[19]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modelling , 2001 .

[20]  S. Kooijman,et al.  From molecules to ecosystems through dynamic energy budget models. , 2000 .

[21]  B. Breckling,et al.  The concepts of emergent and collective properties in individual-based models—Summary and outlook of the Bornhöved case studies , 2005 .

[22]  P. Cury,et al.  Population viability and spatial fish reproductive strategies in constant and changing environments: an individual-based modelling approach , 1997 .

[23]  T. Mehner,et al.  Effects of piscivore‐mediated habitat use on growth, diet and zooplankton consumption of roach: an individual‐based modelling approach , 2002 .

[24]  M. Takeda,et al.  Metabolic adaptation to prolonged starvation in carp , 1990 .

[25]  C. Sindermann Effects of parasites on fish populations: practical considerations. , 1987, International journal for parasitology.

[26]  I. Winfield,et al.  Cyprinid fishes Systematics, biology and exploitation , 1995 .

[27]  A. Łomnicki Population ecology of individuals , 1988 .

[28]  Felix Müller,et al.  Handbook of ecosystem theories and management , 2000 .

[29]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[30]  W. Wieser,et al.  Metabolic responses to food deprivation and refeeding in juveniles of Rutilus rutilus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[31]  F. Hölker,et al.  Energy reserves during food deprivation and compensatory growth in juvenile roach: the importance of season and temperature , 2005 .

[32]  I. Winfield,et al.  The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis , 1986 .

[33]  F. Hölker The metabolic rate of roach in relation to body size and temperature , 2003 .

[34]  S. Kooijman,et al.  Quantitative aspects of metabolic organization: a discussion of concepts. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[35]  A. D. Buijse,et al.  Piscivory, Growth, and Size-Selective Mortality of Age 0 Pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) , 1992 .

[36]  A. Perelson,et al.  Mathematical and Computational Challenges in Population Biology and Ecosystems Science , 1997, Science.

[37]  R. Kirkwood,et al.  SEASONAL-VARIATION IN GROWTH, MORTALITY AND FAT STORES OF ROACH AND PERCH IN LOUGH-NEAGH, NORTHERN-IRELAND , 1995 .

[38]  B. Hepher Nutrition of Pond Fishes , 1988 .

[39]  K. Rose,et al.  Individual variability and spatial heterogeneity in fish population models , 1994, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[40]  R. Eckmann,et al.  No general percid dominance at mesotrophic lake conditions: insights from the quantification of predator-prey interactions** , 2002 .

[41]  P. Withers,et al.  Comparative Animal Physiology , 1992 .

[42]  H. Winkler,et al.  Functional responses of five cyprinid species to planktonic prey , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[43]  S. Diehl Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light , 1988 .

[44]  Broder Breckling,et al.  An individual-based approach to depict the influence of the feeding strategy on the population structure of roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) , 2001 .

[45]  Y Toquenaga,et al.  Frpm artificial individuals to global patterns. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  J. Craig Population dynamics, predation and role in the community , 1996 .

[47]  J. Post,et al.  Size-Dependent Overwinter Mortality of Young-of-the-Year Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens): Laboratory, In Situ Enclosure, and Field Experiments , 1989 .