Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised?

Despite technical improvements, revision rates for total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) remain high. Our goal was to report the reason(s) for revision TKA in a large, current, multicenter series and compare those reasons with previously published reasons. We retrospectively identified 820 consecutive revision TKAs (693 patients, 2000-2012) from our 3 centers and recorded the primary reason for the revision. The top seven reasons for the revision were aseptic loosening (23.1%), infection (18.4%), polyethylene wear (18.1%), instability (17.7%), pain/stiffness (9.3%), osteolysis (4.5%), and malposition/malalignment (2.9%). Comparison with previously published reasons showed fewer TKA revisions for polyethylene wear, osteolysis, instability, and malalignment. These changes may represent improvements in surgical technique and implants.

[1]  M. Ritter,et al.  Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  B. Morrey.  Prevalence of Primary and Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 1990 Through 2002Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, et al (Exponent Inc, Philadelphia) J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:1487–1497, 2005§ , 2006 .

[4]  Daniel J Berry,et al.  The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term Survivorship and Failure Modes of 1000 Cemented Condylar Total Knee Arthroplasties , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  I. Pinder,et al.  Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty. 14-year survivorship analysis of 208 consecutive cases. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Reason for Revision Influences Early Patient Outcomes After Aseptic Knee Revision , 2012, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[7]  Edmund Lau,et al.  Risk of Subsequent Revision after Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  S. Odum,et al.  Early Failures in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  C. G. Moran,et al.  Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty , 1996 .

[10]  Steven Kurtz,et al.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  David A Heck,et al.  Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .