Demonstration and Characterization of Ni/Mg/K/AD90 Used for Pilot-Scale Conditioning of Biomass-Derived Syngas

A fluidizable, Ni/Mg/K/AD90(90% α-Al2O3) catalyst was evaluated in a pilot-scale study with oak-derived syngas for tar and methane reforming at 900 °C. The catalyst was operated in a semi-batch mode for ten individual reaction cycles, each separated by a regeneration protocol consisting of steaming followed by H2 reduction. During the experiment, subsequent reaction cycles showed a decrease in activity as indicated by decreased initial methane conversion. During each reaction cycle, H2S poisoning was the dominant deactivation mechanism, while coking was deemed to be minor in comparison. Catalyst characterization by XRD and TPR suggest that the loss of activity for subsequent reaction cycles coincides with the formation of a NiAl2O4 species that is not fully reduced under process conditions, which in turn results in a decreased number of potential metallic nickel (Ni0) sites available for hydrocarbon steam reforming. An increase in nickel crystallite size with time-on-stream was also observed using XRD, indicating that sintering may also play a role in loss of catalyst activity, although this is not considered the primary deactivation mechanism because activity loss was observed even when nickel crystallite sizes remained nearly constant.

[1]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Olivine as tar removal catalyst for biomass gasifiers: Catalyst characterization , 2005 .

[2]  H. Morioka,et al.  CO2 reforming of CH4 over Ni/Mg–Al oxide catalysts prepared by solid phase crystallization method from Mg–Al hydrotalcite-like precursors , 2001 .

[3]  Tharapong Vitidsant,et al.  Highly efficient sulfur and coking resistance catalysts for tar gasification with steam , 2006 .

[4]  Ian Narváez,et al.  Fresh Tar (from a Biomass Gasifier) Elimination over a Commercial Steam-Reforming Catalyst. Kinetics and Effect of Different Variables of Operation , 1997 .

[5]  A. Corma,et al.  Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[6]  Richard L. Bain,et al.  Fluidizable reforming catalyst development for conditioning biomass-derived syngas , 2007 .

[7]  J. Goodwin,et al.  Hot Gas Removal of Tars, Ammonia, and Hydrogen Sulfide from Biomass Gasification Gas , 2007 .

[8]  José Corella,et al.  Biomass Gasification with Air in Fluidized Bed. Hot Gas Cleanup with Selected Commercial and Full-Size Nickel-Based Catalysts , 2000 .

[9]  S. Rapagnà.  Steam-gasification of biomass in a fluidised-bed of olivine particles. , 2000 .

[10]  Larry G. Felix,et al.  Olivine catalysts for methane- and tar-steam reforming , 2008 .

[11]  Ian Narváez,et al.  Performance of Different Dolomites on Hot Raw Gas Cleaning from Biomass Gasification with Air , 1997 .

[12]  Larry G. Felix,et al.  Ni-olivine catalysts prepared by thermal impregnation: Structure, steam reforming activity, and stability , 2008 .

[13]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  In-Bed Catalytic Tar Reduction in a Dual Fluidized Bed Biomass Steam Gasifier , 2004 .

[14]  Tiejun Wang,et al.  Novel Catalyst for Cracking of Biomass Tar , 2005 .

[15]  José Corella,et al.  Biomass Gasification with Air in a Fluidized Bed: Exhaustive Tar Elimination with Commercial Steam Reforming Catalysts , 1999 .

[16]  José Corella,et al.  Biomass gasification with air in fluidized bed : Reforming of the gas composition with commercial steam reforming Catalysts , 1998 .

[17]  Larry G. Felix,et al.  Optimization of thermally impregnated Ni–olivine catalysts for tar removal , 2009 .

[18]  José Corella,et al.  Olivine or Dolomite as In-Bed Additive in Biomass Gasification with Air in a Fluidized Bed: Which Is Better? , 2004 .

[19]  D. Świerczyński,et al.  Hydrogen production from biomass gasification on nickel catalysts: Tests for dry reforming of methane , 2002 .

[20]  Stefan Czernik,et al.  Hydrogen by Catalytic Steam Reforming of Liquid Byproducts from Biomass Thermoconversion Processes , 2002 .

[21]  C. Courson,et al.  Development of Ni catalysts for gas production from biomass gasification. Reactivity in steam- and dry-reforming , 2000 .

[22]  Jo‐Shu Chang,et al.  The steam reforming of naphthalene over a nickel-dolomite cracking catalyst. , 2005 .

[23]  T. Numaguchi,et al.  Reduction of NiAl2O4 containing catalysts for steam methane reforming reaction , 1997 .

[24]  José Corella,et al.  Improved steam gasification of lignocellulosic residues in a fluidized bed with commercial steam reforming catalysts , 1993 .

[25]  José Corella,et al.  Biomass gasification in fluidized bed : where to locate the dolomite to improve gasification? , 1999 .

[26]  K. Magrini-Bair,et al.  Review of Catalytic Conditioning of Biomass-Derived Syngas , 2009 .

[27]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Hydrogen and Synthesis gas by Steam- and CO2 reforming , 2002 .

[28]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[29]  Steven D. Phillips,et al.  Evaluation of Catalyst Deactivation during Catalytic Steam Reforming of Biomass-Derived Syngas , 2005 .

[30]  M. Hanna,et al.  Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production. , 2008 .