Risk-targeted seismic design maps for mainland France

In this article, the recently proposed approach known as ‘risk targeting’ for the development of national seismic design maps is investigated for mainland France. Risk targeting leads to ground-motion maps that, if used for design purposes, would lead to a uniform level of risk nationally. The Eurocode 8 design loads currently in force for France are used as the basis of this study. Because risk targeting requires various choices on, for example, the level of acceptable risk to be made a priori and these choices are not solely engineering decisions but involve input from decision makers we undertake sensitivity tests to study their influence. It is found that, in contrast to applications of this methodology for US cities, risk targeting does not lead to large modifications with respect to the national seismic hazard map nor to changes in the relative ranking of cities with respect to their design ground motions. This is because the hazard curves for French cities are almost parallel. In addition, we find that using a target annual collapse probability of about 10−5 for seismically designed buildings and a probability of collapse when subjected to the design PGA of 10−5 leads to reasonable results. This is again in contrast to US studies that have adopted much higher values for both these probabilities.

[1]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[2]  Robert P. Kennedy Performance-goal based (risk informed) approach for establishing the SSE site specific response spectrum for future nuclear power plants ☆ , 2011 .

[3]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code‐conforming reinforced‐concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses , 2007 .

[4]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  On the Use of Logic Trees for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Seismic-Hazard Analysis , 2005 .

[5]  W Duckett,et al.  Risk analysis and the acceptable probability of failure , 2005 .

[6]  Takaaki Konno A Developing Risk-informed Design Basis Earthquake Ground Motion Methodology (K169) , 2003 .

[7]  A. Introduction,et al.  A PERFORMANCE-BASED APPROACH TO DEFINE THE SITE-SPECIFIC EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 2007 .

[8]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Risk-Targeted versus Current Seismic Design Maps for the Conterminous United States , 2007 .

[9]  Asadour H. Hadjian A general framework for risk‐consistent seismic design , 2002 .

[10]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A practice‐oriented estimation of the failure probability of building structures , 2012 .

[11]  John Douglas,et al.  Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means of nonlinear time‐history analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment , 2009 .

[13]  J. Bommer,et al.  Adapting earthquake actions in Eurocode 8 for performance‐based seismic design , 2006 .

[14]  Robin K. McGuire,et al.  FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis , 1976 .