Effects of electrode density and electrolyte spreading in dense array electroencephalographic recording

OBJECTIVE High-density EEG recording offers increased spatial resolution but requires careful consideration of how the density of electrodes affects the potentials being measured. Power differences as a function of electrode density and electrolyte spreading were examined and a method for correcting these differences was tested. METHODS Separate EEG recordings from 8 participants were made using a high-density electrode net, first with 6 of 128 electrodes active followed by recordings with all electrodes active. For a subset of 4 participants measurements were counterbalanced with recordings made in the reversed order by drying the hair after the high-density recordings and using a fresh dry electrode net of the same size for the low-density recordings. Mean power values over 6 resting eyes open/closed EEG recordings at the 6 active electrodes common to both recording conditions were compared. Evidence for possible electrolyte spreading or bridging between electrodes was acquired by computing Hjorth electrical distances. Spherical spline interpolation was tested for correcting power values at electrodes affected by electrolyte spreading for these participants and for a subset of participants from a larger previous study. RESULTS For both the complete set and the counterbalanced subset, significant decreases in power at the 6 common electrodes for the high-density recordings were observed across the range of the standard EEG bands (1-44 Hz). The number of bridges or amount of electrolyte spreading towards the reference electrode as evidenced by small Hjorth electrical distances served as a predictor of this power decrease. Spherical spline interpolation increased the power values at electrodes affected by electrolyte spreading and by a significant amount for the larger number of participants in the second group. CONCLUSIONS Understanding signal effects caused by closely spaced electrodes, detecting electrolyte spreading and correcting its effects are important considerations for high-density EEG recordings. A combination of scalp maps of power density and plots of small Hjorth electrical distances can be used to identify electrodes affected by electrolyte spreading. Interpolation using spherical splines offers a method for correcting the potentials measured at these electrodes.

[1]  T. Gasser,et al.  Transformations towards the normal distribution of broad band spectral parameters of the EEG. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Jeffrey B. Henriques,et al.  While a phobic waits: regional brain electrical and autonomic activity in social phobics during anticipation of public speaking , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[3]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[4]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[5]  D. Tucker.  Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  M Hallett,et al.  A method for determining optimal interelectrode spacing for cerebral topographic mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Estimating the spatial Nyquist of the human EEG , 1998 .

[8]  C. Tenke,et al.  Evaluating the quality of ERP measures across recording systems: a commentary on Debener et al. (2002). , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  Jürgen Kayser,et al.  A convenient method for detecting electrolyte bridges in multichannel electroencephalogram and event-related potential recordings , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Jeffrey B. Henriques,et al.  Asymmetrical brain electrical activity discriminates between psychometrically-matched verbal and spatial cognitive tasks. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[11]  P. Nunez,et al.  Spatial‐temporal structures of human alpha rhythms: Theory, microcurrent sources, multiscale measurements, and global binding of local networks , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed? , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Engel,et al.  Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[14]  R. E. Wheeler,et al.  Psychometric properties of resting anterior EEG asymmetry: temporal stability and internal consistency. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  N. Kalin,et al.  Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  P. Welch.  The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[18]  R. Davidson,et al.  Frontal brain asymmetry in restrained eaters. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  a.R.V.,et al.  Clinical neurophysiology , 1961, Neurology.

[20]  Richard J. Iiaviiison.  EEG MEASURES OF CEREBRAL ASYMMETRY: CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES , 1987 .

[21]  D. Tucker,et al.  Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .

[23]  Z J Koles,et al.  Systematic comparisons of interpolation techniques in topographic brain mapping. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  R. Fisher.  014: On the "Probable Error" of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample. , 1921 .

[25]  E. M. FletcheraTb,et al.  Estimation of interpolation errors in scalp topographic mapping , 2003 .

[26]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  Development of high-resolution EEG devices , 1999 .

[27]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.