INTRACELLULAR OBSERVATIONS ON THE EFFECTS OF MUSCARINIC AGONISTS ON RAT SYMPATHETIC NEURONES

1 Responses of single neurones in isolated superior cervical ganglia of the rat to muscarinic agonists were recorded with intracellular microelectrodes. 2 (±)‐Muscarine (1 to 10 μm) and methylfurmethide (1 to 3 μm) produced reversible membrane depolarizations (≤ 15 mV) accompanied by a fall in input conductance and an increased tendency toward repetitive spike discharges. The spike configuration was unchanged. 3 Analysis of steady‐state current/voltage curves revealed the most consistent muscarinic effect to be a large reduction (∼50% at 10 μm muscarine) in input slope conductance around rest potential. This conductance decrease diminished as the membrane was hyperpolarized, and the normal increase in slope conductance with membrane depolarization was depressed. The current/voltage curves in the presence and absence of agonist did not usually intersect; in a few tests, the curves intersected at between −65 and −88 mV (i.e. 9 to 28 mV hyperpolarized to rest potential). 4 Divalent cations (10 mm [Ca2+] or [Mg2+]) showed a small muscarine‐like effect on the current/voltage and slope conductance/voltage curves, but did not affect the action of muscarine itself. 5 Tetraethylammonium (TEA, 5 mm) also had a small muscarine‐like effect, and depressed or reversed the action of muscarine. However, TEA differed from muscarine in blocking orthodromic transmission and prolonging direct spike repolarization. 6 It is concluded that the primary effect of muscarinic agonists is to alter the rectifying properties of the cell within the potential range −80 to −40 mV.

[1]  J. Garthwaite,et al.  MUSCARINIC RECEPTORS IN RAT SYMPATHETIC GANGLIA , 1980, British journal of pharmacology.

[2]  D. A. Brown,et al.  Muscarinic suppression of a novel voltage-sensitive K+ current in a vertebrate neurone , 1980, Nature.

[3]  P. Yarowsky,et al.  Calcium‐dependent potentials in the mammalian sympathetic neurone. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Volle,et al.  Responses of the rat superior cervical ganglion in vitro to isoprenaline and bethanechol , 1978, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[5]  C. Scholfield,et al.  Electrical properties of neurones in the olfactory cortex slice in vitro. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  K. Koketsu,et al.  Postsynaptic potentiation of the slow muscarinic excitatory response by tetraethylammonium chloride in the bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells , 1977, Brain Research.

[7]  R. Dingledine,et al.  Ach-evoked excitation of cortical neurones [proceedings]. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  E. Barrett,et al.  Separation of two voltage‐sensitive potassium currents, and demonstration of a tetrodotoxin‐resistant calcium current in frog motoneurones. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  K Koketsu,et al.  Ionic mechanism of the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells. , 1974, Brain research.

[10]  R. Muller,et al.  Voltage-Dependent Conductance Induced in Thin Lipid Membranes by Monazomycin , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  T. R. Colburn,et al.  Linear voltage control of current passed through a micropipette with variable resistance , 1972, Medical and biological engineering.

[12]  K. Krnjević,et al.  The mechanism of excitation by acetylcholine in the cerebral cortex , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  F. F. Weight,et al.  Slow Synaptic Excitation in Sympathetic Ganglion Cells: Evidence for Synaptic Inactivation of Potassium Conductance , 1970, Science.

[14]  B. Libet,et al.  Actions of noradrenaline and acetylcholine on sympathetic ganglion cells , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  B. L. Ginsborg Ion movements in junctional transmission. , 1967, Pharmacological reviews.

[16]  W. Riker EFFECTS OF TETRAETHYLAMMONIUM ON SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION IN THE FROG SYMPATHETIC GANGLION. , 1965, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[17]  W. Riker EFFECTS OF TETRAETHYLAMMONIUM CHLORIDE ON ELECTRICAL ACTIVITIES OF FROG SYMPATHETIC GANGLION CELLS. , 1964, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[18]  G. H. Acheson,et al.  The blocking effect of tetraethylammonium ion on the superior cervical ganglion of the cat. , 1946, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[19]  K. Koketsu,et al.  Analysis of the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells. , 1976, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[20]  K Koketsu,et al.  The muscarinic effects of acetylcholine on the action potential of bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells. , 1976, The Japanese journal of physiology.