Patient-controlled sharing of medical imaging data across unaffiliated healthcare organizations

BACKGROUND Current image sharing is carried out by manual transportation of CDs by patients or organization-coordinated sharing networks. The former places a significant burden on patients and providers. The latter faces challenges to patient privacy. OBJECTIVE To allow healthcare providers efficient access to medical imaging data acquired at other unaffiliated healthcare facilities while ensuring strong protection of patient privacy and minimizing burden on patients, providers, and the information technology infrastructure. METHODS An image sharing framework is described that involves patients as an integral part of, and with full control of, the image sharing process. Central to this framework is the Patient Controlled Access-key REgistry (PCARE) which manages the access keys issued by image source facilities. When digitally signed by patients, the access keys are used by any requesting facility to retrieve the associated imaging data from the source facility. A centralized patient portal, called a PCARE patient control portal, allows patients to manage all the access keys in PCARE. RESULTS A prototype of the PCARE framework has been developed by extending open-source technology. The results for feasibility, performance, and user assessments are encouraging and demonstrate the benefits of patient-controlled image sharing. DISCUSSION The PCARE framework is effective in many important clinical cases of image sharing and can be used to integrate organization-coordinated sharing networks. The same framework can also be used to realize a longitudinal virtual electronic health record. CONCLUSION The PCARE framework allows prior imaging data to be shared among unaffiliated healthcare facilities while protecting patient privacy with minimal burden on patients, providers, and infrastructure. A prototype has been implemented to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of this approach.

[1]  Eliot Siegel,et al.  Informatics in radiology: image exchange: IHE and the evolution of image sharing. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  I. Kohane,et al.  Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Tony Pan,et al.  VirtualPACS—A Federating Gateway to Access Remote Image Data Resources over the Grid , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[4]  Reinhold Haux,et al.  An e-consent-based shared EHR system architecture for integrated healthcare networks , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  D Kalra,et al.  Information architecture for a federated health record server. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[6]  D. McGraw,et al.  Privacy as an enabler, not an impediment: building trust into health information exchange. , 2009, Health affairs.

[7]  Adam E Flanders,et al.  Medical image and data sharing: are we there yet? , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  A Framework for evaluating the costs, effort, and value of nationwide health information exchange , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[10]  Melissa M. Goldstein,et al.  Health Information Technology and the Idea of Informed Consent , 2010, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[11]  David Raths Shifting away from silos. The interoperability challenges that hospitals face pale in comparison to the headaches plaguing state departments. , 2010, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[12]  Bradford W Hesse,et al.  What Do People Affected by Cancer Think About Electronic Health Information Exchange? Results From the 2010 LIVESTRONG Electronic Health Information Exchange Survey and the 2008 Health Information National Trends Survey. , 2011, Journal of oncology practice.

[13]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Early Experiences with Personal Health Records , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  Gilad J. Kuperman,et al.  Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing? , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  B. Just,et al.  Managing the integrity of patient identity in health information exchange. , 2009, Journal of AHIMA.

[16]  Isaac S Kohane,et al.  Model Formulation: A Self-scaling, Distributed Information Architecture for Public Health, Research, and Clinical Care , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  John Leipold,et al.  The 42 CFR Part 2 and NHIN conundrum. , 2009, Behavioral healthcare.

[18]  Charlotte Lennox,et al.  Share, don't hoard: The importance of information exchange in 21st century health-criminal justice partnerships. , 2011, Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH.

[19]  Steve D Gravely,et al.  The next step in health data exchanges: trust and privacy in exchange networks. , 2009, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[20]  Joshua R. Vest,et al.  Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Kurt Ullman Indiana data network provides one stop for inter-hospital connectivity. How an Indiana-based regional health data exchange helps CIOs save time and money. , 2010, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[22]  Julie A Dooling,et al.  Managing the integrity of patient identity in health information exchange (updated). , 2014, Journal of AHIMA.

[23]  Jennifer Prestigiacomo Taking it to the clouds. The image movement of Montana starts sharing images via cloud-based solution. , 2010, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[24]  Dan Rode Building trust into the NHIN: Key legislation can ensure the privacy of personal health information. , 2005, Journal of AHIMA.

[25]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Grid-based implementation of XDS-I as part of image-enabled EHR for regional healthcare in Shanghai , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[26]  Kevin B. Johnson,et al.  A Regional Health Information Exchange: Architecture and Implementation , 2008, AMIA.

[27]  John Donnelly,et al.  Building an interoperable regional health information network today with IHE integration profiles. , 2006, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[28]  Ashley Edwards,et al.  Barriers to cross--institutional health information exchange: a literature review. , 2010, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[29]  Kim M. Unertl,et al.  Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Kim Vernon,et al.  Electronic signature, attestation, and authorship (updated). , 2009, Journal of AHIMA.

[31]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Architectural Strategies and Issues with Health Information Exchange , 2006, AMIA.

[32]  John DeGaspari Staying ahead of the curve on data security. Securing patient data in a changing healthcare landscape. , 2010, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[33]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  A Survey of Health Information Exchange Organizations in the United States: Implications for Meaningful Use , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  Qingxia Chen,et al.  User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[35]  Clement McDonald,et al.  Protecting patients in health information exchange: a defense of the HIPAA privacy rule. , 2009, Health affairs.