Validity of the WHO VAW study instrument for estimating gender-based violence against women.

OBJECTIVE To validate the instrument of the World Health Organization Violence Against Women (WHO VAW) study on psychological, physical and sexual violence against women perpetrated by intimate partners. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study conducted in several countries between 2000 and 2003, including Brazil. Representative random samples of women aged 15-49 years with intimate partners were selected, living in the city of São Paulo (n = 940) and in the Zona da Mata, Pernambuco (n = 1,188), southeastern and northeastern regions, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis on questions relating to violence was performed (four psychological, six physical and three sexual questions), with varimax rotation and creation of three factors. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to analyze the internal consistency. To validate through extreme groups, mean scores (0 to 13 points) for violence were tested in relation to the following outcomes: self-rated health, daily activities, presence of discomfort or pain, suicidal ideation or attempts, heavy alcohol consumption and presence of common mental disorders. RESULTS Three factors were defined, with similar accumulated variance (0.6092 in São Paulo and 0.6350 in the Zona da Mata). For São Paulo, the first factor was determined by physical violence, the second by sexual violence and the third by psychological violence. For the Zona da Mata, the first factor was formed by psychological violence, the second by physical violence and the third by sexual violence. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.88 in São Paulo and 0.89 in the Zona da Mata. The mean scores for violence were significantly higher for less favorable outcomes, with the exception of suicide attempts in São Paulo. CONCLUSIONS The instrument was shown to be adequate for estimating gender-based violence against women perpetrated by intimate partners and can be used in studies on this subject. It has high internal consistency and a capacity to discriminate between different forms of violence (psychological, physical and sexual) perpetrated in different social contexts. The instrument also characterizes the female victim and her relationship with the aggressor, thereby facilitating gender analysis.

[1]  Carmen Vives Cases.  Un modelo ecológico integrado para comprender la violencia contra las mujeres: Comentarios de Carmen Vives Cases del artículo: Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence against Women 1998; 4: 262-290. De: L Heise. , 2011 .

[2]  L. Schraiber,et al.  [Violence and health: theoretical, methodological, and ethical contributions from studies on violence against women]. , 2009, Cadernos de saude publica.

[3]  Charlotte Watts,et al.  WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women: Initial Results on Prevalence, Health Outcomes and Women's Responses , 2008 .

[4]  C. Watts,et al.  Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study , 2008, The Lancet.

[5]  A. Ludermir,et al.  Violence against women by their intimate partner and common mental disorders. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[6]  A. Ludermir,et al.  [Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in regions of Brazil]. , 2007, Revista de saude publica.

[7]  C. Watts,et al.  Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence , 2006, The Lancet.

[8]  L. Schraiber,et al.  Violência dói e não é direito: a violência contra a mulher, a saúde e os direitos humanos , 2005 .

[9]  Marie-Marthe Cousineau,et al.  Toward a Transnational and Cross-Cultural Analysis of Family Violence , 2004 .

[10]  L. Saltzman.  Definitional and Methodological Issues Related to Transnational Research on Intimate Partner Violence , 2004 .

[11]  C. Watts,et al.  Interviewer Training in the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence , 2004 .

[12]  M. Reichenheim,et al.  [Cross-cultural adaptation of the Portuguese version of the Conflict Tactics Scales Form R (CTS-1) used to assess marital violence: semantic and measurement equivalence]. , 2003, Cadernos de saude publica.

[13]  C. Watts,et al.  RESPONDING TO VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: WHO's Multicountry Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence , 2003 .

[14]  R. Jewkes,et al.  Risk factors for domestic violence: findings from a South African cross-sectional study. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Jacquelyn C Campbell,et al.  Health consequences of intimate partner violence , 2002, The Lancet.

[16]  Charlotte Watts,et al.  Violence against women: global scope and magnitude , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  A. Winkvist,et al.  Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations. , 2001, Studies in family planning.

[18]  A. Myhill,et al.  Comparing the methodology of the new national surveys of violence against women , 2001 .

[19]  Jacquelyn C. Campbell,et al.  Ending Violence against Women , 2010 .

[20]  L. Heise.  Violence against women: an integrated, ecological framework. , 1998, Violence against women.

[21]  J. Mcfarlane,et al.  Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care , 1993, JAMA.

[22]  D. Dutton.  The Domestic Assault of Women: Psychological and Criminal Justice Perspectives , 1988 .