Measuring individual identity information in animal signals: Overview and performance of available identity metrics
暂无分享,去创建一个
Daniel T. Blumstein | Martin Šálek | Pavel Linhart | Tomasz S. Osiejuk | Michał Budka | Marek Špinka | Richard Policht | Michaela Syrová | M. Špinka | D. Blumstein | T. Osiejuk | Michał Budka | R. Policht | P. Linhart | M. Šálek | M. Syrová
[1] J. Bradbury,et al. Principles of animal communication, 2nd ed. , 2011 .
[2] G. Zararsiz,et al. MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality , 2014, R J..
[3] I. Charrier,et al. Mother–Calf vocal communication in Atlantic walrus: a first field experimental study , 2010, Animal Cognition.
[4] G. Carter,et al. Adult Vampire Bats Produce Contact Calls When Isolated: Acoustic Variation by Species, Population, Colony, and Individual , 2012, PloS one.
[5] Aaron C. Koralek,et al. What the hyena's laugh tells: Sex, age, dominance and individual signature in the giggling call of Crocuta crocuta , 2010, BMC Ecology.
[6] J. Dale,et al. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[7] S. Stafford,et al. Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research , 2000, Springer New York.
[8] Individual Variation , 1910, Botanical Gazette.
[9] P. Marler,et al. Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.
[10] Individual differences in facial configuration in large-billed crows , 2013, acta ethologica.
[11] T Lengagne,et al. A method of independent time and frequency decomposition of bioacoustic signals: inter-individual recognition in four species of penguins. , 1997, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.
[12] M. Špinka,et al. Ontogeny of individual and litter identity signaling in grunts of piglets. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] H. E. Winn,et al. Signature information in the song of the humpback whale , 1979 .
[14] D. B. Miller,et al. Species-typical and individually distinctive acoustic features of crow calls of red jungle fowl. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.
[15] Peter K. McGregor,et al. Census and monitoring based on individually identifiable vocalizations: the role of neural networks , 2002 .
[16] David Reby,et al. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] E. Chadwick,et al. Scent signals individual identity and country of origin in otters , 2015 .
[18] T. Dabelsteen,et al. Acoustic cues to individual identity in the rattle calls of common blackbirds: a potential for individual recognition through multi-syllabic vocalisations emitted in both territorial and alarm contexts , 2015 .
[19] E. Briefer,et al. Cross-modal recognition of familiar conspecifics in goats , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.
[20] Pierre Bellec,et al. A Bayesian Alternative to Mutual Information for the Hierarchical Clustering of Dependent Random Variables , 2015, PloS one.
[21] M. Nachman,et al. Morphological and population genomic evidence that human faces have evolved to signal individual identity , 2014, Nature Communications.
[22] T. Osiejuk,et al. Is it possible to acoustically identify individuals within a population? , 2014, Journal of Ornithology.
[23] E. Briefer,et al. Social effects on vocal ontogeny in an ungulate, the goat, Capra hircus , 2012, Animal Behaviour.
[24] Roger Mundry,et al. Discriminant function analysis with nonindependent data: consequences and an alternative , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[25] T. Osiejuk,et al. Formant Frequencies are Acoustic Cues to Caller Discrimination and are a Weak Indicator of the Body Size of Corncrake Males , 2013 .
[26] S. Partan. Ten unanswered questions in multimodal communication , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[27] Irena Schneiderová. Frequency-modulated second elements of two-element alarm calls do not enhance discrimination of callers in three Eurasian ground squirrels , 2012 .
[28] Daniel T. Blumstein,et al. Pre‐screening acoustic and other natural signatures for use in noninvasive individual identification , 2010 .
[29] Andreas M. Ali,et al. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus , 2011 .
[30] Thierry Aubin,et al. Individuality in the voice of the emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy environment , 2010 .
[31] W. Thorpe,et al. The Basis for Individual Recognition By Voice in the Sandwich Tern (Sterna Sandvicensis) , 1968 .
[32] Michael D. Beecher,et al. Signature Systems and Kin Recognition , 1982 .
[33] P. Stoddard,et al. Acoustic adaptations for parent-offspring recognition in swallows. , 1986, Experimental biology.
[34] Brian D. Ripley,et al. Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition , 2002 .
[35] Dan Stowell,et al. Automatic acoustic identification of individuals in multiple species: improving identification across recording conditions , 2019, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.
[36] E. N. Lapshina,et al. The ontogeny of acoustic individuality in the nasal calls of captive goitred gazelles, Gazella subgutturosa , 2012, Behavioural Processes.
[37] Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga,et al. patternize: An R package for quantifying colour pattern variation , 2017, Methods in ecology and evolution.
[38] G. Fonseca,et al. Gender, Age, and Identity in the Isolation Calls of Antillean Manatees ( Trichechus manatus manatus ) , 2008 .
[39] Gerard V. Trunk,et al. A Problem of Dimensionality: A Simple Example , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[40] Leanne Proops,et al. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[41] P. Jouventin,et al. How to measure information carried by a modulated vocal signature? , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] L A Dugatkin,et al. Evolving cooperation: the role of individual recognition. , 1996, Bio Systems.
[43] M. A. Bee,et al. Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans : implications for individual discrimination , 2001 .
[44] Daniel T. Blumstein,et al. Social Group Size Predicts the Evolution of Individuality , 2011, Current Biology.
[45] M. D. Beecher. Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach , 1989, Animal Behaviour.
[46] R. Wiley,et al. Specificity and multiplicity in the recognition of individuals: implications for the evolution of social behaviour , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[47] E. Tibbetts,et al. Complex social behaviour can select for variability in visual features: a case study in Polistes wasps , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[48] M. Lein. Song Variation In Buff-Breasted Flycatchers (Empidonax fulvifrons) , 2008 .
[49] William L. Allen,et al. Assessing the potential information content of multicomponent visual signals: a machine learning approach , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[50] Klaus Zuberbühler,et al. A method for automated individual, species and call type recognition in free-ranging animals , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[51] K. Furton,et al. The Equine Volatilome: Volatile Organic Compounds as Discriminatory Markers , 2018 .
[52] G. Wilkinson. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat , 1984, Nature.
[53] I. Charrier,et al. A review of social recognition in pinnipeds , 2003 .
[54] J. Arnould,et al. Individual variation in the pup attraction call produced by female Australian fur seals during early lactation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] Clara Pizzuti,et al. FOR CLOSENESS : ADJUSTING NORMALIZED MUTUAL INFORMATION MEASURE FOR CLUSTERING COMPARISON , 2016 .
[56] Martin Šálek,et al. The assessment of biases in the acoustic discrimination of individuals , 2017, PloS one.
[57] Frédéric E Theunissen,et al. Zebra finches identify individuals using vocal signatures unique to each call type , 2018, Nature Communications.