Série Scientifique Scientific Series Performance of Software Agents in Non-transferable Payoff Group Buying Performance of Software Agents in Non- Transferable Payoff Group Buying *

Software agents can be useful in forming buyers’ groups since humans have considerable difficulties in finding Pareto-optimal deals (no buyer can be better without another being worse) in negotiation situations. What are the computational and economical performances of software agents for a group buying problem? We have developed a negotiation protocol for software agents which we have evaluated to see if the problem is difficult on average and why. This protocol probably finds a Pareto-optimal solution and, furthermore, minimizes the worst distance to ideal among all software agents given strict preference ordering. This evaluation demonstrated that the performance of software agents in this group buying problem is limited by memory requirements (and not execution time complexity). We have also investigated whether software agents following the developed protocol have a different buying behaviour from that which the customer they represented would have had in the same situation. Results show that software agents have a greater difference of behaviour (and better behaviour since they can always simulate the obvious customer behaviour of buying alone their preferred product) when they have similar preferences over the space of available products. We also discuss the type of behaviour changes and their frequencies based on the situation.

[1]  Toramatsu Shintani,et al.  A Group Buy Protocol based on Coalition Formation for Agent-mediated E-Commerce , 2002 .

[2]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Automated Negotiation and Decision Making in Multiagent Environments , 2001, EASSS.

[3]  Taner Bilgiç,et al.  A column generation approach to the coalition formation problem in multi-agent systems , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  Xin Guo,et al.  An optimal strategy for sellers in an online auction , 2002, TOIT.

[5]  Toramatsu Shintani,et al.  A buyers integration support system in group buying , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on e-Commerce Technology, 2004. CEC 2004..

[6]  Solomon W. Golomb,et al.  Backtrack Programming , 1965, JACM.

[7]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[8]  A. Nijenhuis.  Combinatorial algorithms , 1975 .

[9]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  A coalition formation mechanism based on inter-agent trust relationships , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[10]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an , 1997 .

[11]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A Classification Scheme for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce , 2001, AgentLink.

[12]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Algorithm for combinatorial coalition formation and payoff division in an electronic marketplace , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[13]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Anytime coalition structure generation: an average case study , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[14]  Soe-Tsyr Yuan,et al.  Negotiation-Credit Driven Coalition Formation in E-Markets , 2001, PRIMA.

[15]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  SouthamptonTAC: An adaptive autonomous trading agent , 2003, TOIT.

[16]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  An Optimal Coalition Formation among Buyer Agents Based on a Genetic Algorithm , 2003, IEA/AIE.

[17]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[18]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  A stable and efficient buyer coalition formation scheme for e-marketplaces , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[19]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Agent Reasoning Mechanism for Long–Term Coalitions Based on Decision Making and Trust , 2002, Comput. Intell..

[20]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  A Classification Scheme for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce , 2001 .

[21]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[22]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Complexity of determining nonemptiness of the core , 2003, EC '03.

[23]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Solutions manual for Microeconomic theory : Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green , 1997 .

[24]  Brahim Chaib-draa,et al.  Coalition formation with non-transferable payoff for group buying , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[25]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  The Search for Coalition Formation in Costly Environments , 2003, CIA.

[26]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Customer Coalitions in Electronic Markets , 2000, AMEC.

[27]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Rules of Encounter - Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers , 1994 .

[28]  Thomas R. Ioerger,et al.  Combining bundle search with buyer coalition formation in electronic markets: a distributed approach through negotiation , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[29]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Developing a bidding agent for multiple heterogeneous auctions , 2003, TOIT.

[30]  Onn Shehory,et al.  Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees , 2022 .

[31]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  Dancing links , 2000, cs/0011047.

[32]  Bohn Stafleu van Loghum,et al.  Online … , 2002, LOG IN.

[33]  Victor Lesser,et al.  Negotiation among self-interested computationally limited agents , 1996 .

[34]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence , 2000 .

[35]  Michael Luck,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems and Applications , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[36]  Robert J. Aumann,et al.  Linearity of unrestrictedly transferable utilities , 1960 .

[37]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Searching for optimal coalition structures , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[38]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Generating coalition structures with finite bound from the optimal guarantees , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[39]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Coalition formation for large-scale electronic markets , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[40]  Donald L. Kreher,et al.  Combinatorial algorithms: generation, enumeration, and search , 1998, SIGA.

[41]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Feasible Formation of Coalitions Among Autonomous Agents in Nonsuperadditive Environments , 1999, Comput. Intell..

[42]  Jim Woodcock,et al.  Millennial Perspectives in Computer Science: Proceedings of the 1999 Oxford-Microsoft Symposium in Honour of Sir Tony Hoare (Cornerstones of computing) , 2000 .

[43]  C. Jackson Grayson,et al.  Decisions Under Uncertainty: Drilling Decisions by Oil and Gas Operators. , 1961 .

[44]  Samir Aknine,et al.  A multi-agent method for forming and dynamic restructuring of pareto optimal coalitions , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[45]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Distributed rational decision making , 1999 .