Efficient Prediction of Grain Boundary Energies from Atomistic Simulations via Sequential Design

Data based materials science is the new promise to accelerate materials design. Especially in computational materials science, data generation can easily be automatized. Usually, the focus is on processing and evaluating the data to derive rules or to discover new materials, while less attention is being paid on the strategy to generate the data. In this work, we show that by a sequential design of experiment scheme, the process of generating and learning from the data can be combined to discover the relevant sections of the parameter space. Our example is the energy of grain boundaries as a function of their geometric degrees of freedom, calculated via atomistic simulations. The sampling of this grain boundary energy space, or even subspaces of it, represents a challenge due to the presence of deep cusps of the energy, which are located at irregular intervals of the geometric parameters. Existing approaches to sample grain boundary energy subspaces therefore either need a huge amount of datapoints or a priori knowledge of the positions of these cusps. We combine statistical methods with atomistic simulations and a sequential sampling technique and compare this strategy to a regular sampling technique. We thereby demonstrate that this sequential design is able to sample a subspace with a minimal amount of points while finding unknown cusps automatically.

[1]  R. Valiev,et al.  Advanced Materials for Mechanical Engineering: Ultrafine‐Grained Alloys with Multilayer Coatings , 2021, Advanced Engineering Materials.

[2]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[3]  C. Schuh,et al.  Six decades of the Hall–Petch effect – a survey of grain-size strengthening studies on pure metals , 2016 .

[4]  Hyuk-Joong Lee,et al.  An identification scheme of grain boundaries and construction of a grain boundary energy database , 2011 .

[5]  D. McDowell,et al.  Symmetric and asymmetric tilt grain boundary structure and energy in Cu and Al (and transferability to other fcc metals) , 2015, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation.

[6]  Arash Dehghan Banadaki,et al.  A simple faceting model for the interfacial and cleavage energies of Σ3 grain boundaries in the complete boundary plane orientation space , 2016 .

[7]  Christopher K. I. Williams,et al.  Modelling Frontal Discontinuities in Wind Fields , 2002 .

[8]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[9]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[10]  Barend J. Thijsse,et al.  Using artificial neural networks to predict grain boundary energies , 2014 .

[11]  P. Guttorp,et al.  Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIX On the Matérn correlation family , 2006 .

[12]  Qi Shao,et al.  Metallic nanostructures with low dimensionality for electrochemical water splitting. , 2020, Chemical Society reviews.

[13]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Exploratory designs for computational experiments , 1995 .

[14]  Byeong-Joo Lee,et al.  Computation of grain boundary energies , 2004 .

[15]  W. Read,et al.  Dislocation Models of Crystal Grain Boundaries , 1950 .

[16]  Vasily V. Bulatov,et al.  Grain boundary energy function for fcc metals , 2014 .

[17]  Je-hyun Lee,et al.  Alloy design strategies to increase strength and its trade-offs together , 2020 .

[18]  Dick den Hertog,et al.  Constrained Maximin Designs for Computer Experiments , 2003, Technometrics.

[19]  V. Roshan Joseph,et al.  Space-filling designs for computer experiments: A review , 2016 .

[20]  Erik A. Wu,et al.  Interfaces and Interphases in All-Solid-State Batteries with Inorganic Solid Electrolytes. , 2020, Chemical reviews.

[21]  David L. Olmsted,et al.  Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals: I. Grain boundary energy , 2009 .

[22]  Xin Sun,et al.  Probing grain boundary sink strength at the nanoscale: Energetics and length scales of vacancy and interstitial absorption by grain boundaries in α -Fe , 2012 .

[23]  Luca Vogt Statistics For Spatial Data , 2016 .

[24]  Michel Rappaz,et al.  Orientation selection in dendritic evolution , 2006, Nature materials.

[25]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: Kriging metamodelling , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Rae. Z.H. Aliyev,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data , 2018, Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research.

[27]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[28]  Jason K. Streit,et al.  Autonomous materials discovery driven by Gaussian process regression with inhomogeneous measurement noise and anisotropic kernels , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[29]  V. Paulsen,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces , 2016 .

[30]  D. Wolf,et al.  A read-shockley model for high-angle grain boundaries , 1989 .

[31]  Saiyi Li,et al.  Atomistic simulations of energies for arbitrary grain boundaries. Part II: Statistical analysis of energies for tilt and twist grain boundaries , 2019, Computational Materials Science.

[32]  A. Karma,et al.  Method for computing the anisotropy of the solid-liquid interfacial free energy. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[33]  Seungwu Han,et al.  Development of new interatomic potentials appropriate for crystalline and liquid iron , 2003 .

[34]  H. Dette,et al.  Efficient sampling in materials simulation - Exploring the parameter space of grain boundaries , 2017 .

[35]  A. Rollett,et al.  Grain boundary energies in body-centered cubic metals , 2015 .