Stimulating the Potential: Creative Performance and Communication in Innovation Teams

Creativity is essential to successful new product development efforts. Teams constitute the organizing principle in most modern innovation activities. Although creativity research has revealed many factors influencing individual creativity, little is known about how team-level creativity is determined. Since the creative innovation task requires teams to combine and integrate input from multiple team members, the team's communication pattern is an important determinant of team creativity. Based on a sample of 44 NPD teams in eleven companies, this study examines the effects of team-member communication on team creativity. It is found that both interaction frequency and subgroup-formation of communication have a negative relationship to team creativity. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and further research is indicated.

[1]  Giacomo Mauro DAriano.  Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. , 1994 .

[2]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[3]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[4]  ReagansRay,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity , 2001 .

[5]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Some Determinants of Interpersonal Communication , 1960 .

[6]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[7]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social influence processes in group brainstorming. , 1993 .

[8]  D. L. Rogers.  Sociometric Analysis of Interorganizational Relations; Application of Theory and Measurement. , 1974 .

[9]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[10]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Communication and performance : an empirical study in innovation teams , 2001 .

[11]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[12]  John A. Czepiel.  Word-of-Mouth Processes in the Diffusion of a Major Technological Innovation , 1974 .

[13]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[14]  Tudor Rickards,et al.  Innovation and creativity: woods, trees and pathways , 1991 .

[15]  Quentin W. Fleming,et al.  Integrated project development teams: another fad … or a permanent change , 1996 .

[16]  Greg R. Oldham,et al.  Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts for the High Potential Employee , 1997 .

[17]  B. Cohen,et al.  Status processes in enduring work groups. , 1991 .

[18]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[19]  企業研究会.  Organizational Intelligence , 2019, Strategic Intelligence for the Future 1.

[20]  H. Triandis.  Cognitive Similarity and Communication in a Dyad , 1960 .

[21]  B. A. Farbey,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1966 .

[22]  T. Amabile,et al.  The conditions of creativity. , 1988 .

[23]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[24]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Changes in the Work Environment for Creativity During Downsizing , 1999 .

[25]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[26]  P. C. Muller.  Team-based conceptualization of new products , 1999 .

[27]  Yehouda Shenhav,et al.  Expected Managerial Careers within Growing and Declining R&D Establishments , 1991 .

[28]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[29]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Managing product development teams effectively , 2002 .

[30]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[31]  R. F. Lovelace,et al.  Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention , 1986 .

[32]  M. West.  Innovation and creativity at work , 1997 .

[33]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[34]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[35]  R. Hisrich,et al.  Creativity and Innovation , 2021 .

[36]  H. Simon,et al.  Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. , 1958 .

[37]  R. Luce,et al.  A method of matrix analysis of group structure , 1949, Psychometrika.

[38]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Determinants of Goal Commitment , 1988 .

[39]  T. Snijders.  The degree variance: An index of graph heterogeneity , 1981 .

[40]  Pieter Terlouw,et al.  Improving Performance of Product Development Teams through Managing Polarity , 2001 .

[41]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[42]  Elisabeth Brauner,et al.  Editorial: The Information Processing Approach as a Perspective for Groups Research , 2000 .

[43]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Social Capital and Opportunity in Corporate R&D: The Contingent Effect of Contact Density on Mobility Expectations , 1998 .