A NETWORK APPROACH FOR UNDERSTANDING AND ANALYZING PRODUCT CO-CONSIDERATION RELATIONS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN

This paper presents a product association network to characterize customers' consideration preferences, where both descriptive and quantitative approaches are proposed to interpret the co-consideration relations by the underlying factors of product and customer attributes. The integrated network approach provides an easy-to-understand visual representation as well as quantitative evaluations of the important factors that affect customers’ co-consideration decisions.

[1]  Roberto J. Bayardo,et al.  Mining the most interesting rules , 1999, KDD '99.

[2]  T. Evgeniou,et al.  Disjunctions of Conjunctions, Cognitive Simplicity, and Consideration Sets , 2010 .

[3]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  John Hauser,et al.  Two-Stage Models : Identifying Non-Compensatory Heuristics for the Consideration Set then Adaptive Polyhedral Methods Within the Consideration Set , 2007 .

[5]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[6]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[7]  J. Benzecri L'analyse des données@@@L'analyse des donnees , 1975 .

[8]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products , 2007 .

[9]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[10]  Wei Chen,et al.  Analyzing and Predicting Heterogeneous Customer Preferences in China’s Auto Market Using Choice Modeling and Network Analysis , 2015 .

[11]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[12]  Erin F. MacDonald,et al.  Market-System Design Optimization With Consider-Then-Choose Models , 2014 .

[13]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions , 2007, Psychometrika.

[14]  M. Greenacre Correspondence analysis in practice , 1993 .

[15]  Anja Dieckmann,et al.  Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[16]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[17]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Brand diagnostics: Mapping branding effects using consumer associative networks , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Yan Fu,et al.  A Multidimensional Network Approach for Modeling Customer-Product Relations in Engineering Design , 2015 .

[19]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[20]  M. Greenacre,et al.  Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods , 2006 .

[21]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .