Formalism-Independent Specification of Ontology Mappings - A Metamodeling Approach

Recently, the advantages of metamodeling for the graphical specification of ontologies have been recognized by the semantic web community This has lead to a number of activities concerned with the development of graphical modeling approaches for the Web Ontology Language based on the Meta Object Facility (MOF) and the Unified Modeling Language (UML) An aspect that has not been addressed so far is the need to specify mappings between heterogenous ontologies With an increasing number of ontologies being available, the problem of specifying mappings is becoming more important and the rationales for providing model based graphical modeling support for mappings is the same as for the ontologies themselves In this paper, we therefore propose a MOF-based metamodel for mappings between OWL DL ontologies.

[1]  Borys Omelayenko RDFT: A Mapping Meta-Ontology for Business Integration , 2003 .

[2]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation , 2007, J. Data Semant..

[3]  Antonis C. Kakas,et al.  Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Boris Motik,et al.  MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.

[5]  Sergio Tessaris,et al.  Rules and Queries with Ontologies: a Unifying Logical Framework , 2005, Description Logics.

[6]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Jos Warmer,et al.  The object constraint language , 1998 .

[8]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Interoperability and Integration , 2005, Semantic Interoperability and Integration.

[9]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Representation of Semantic Mappings , 2005, Semantic Interoperability and Integration.

[10]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  C-OWL: Contextualizing Ontologies , 2003, SEMWEB.

[11]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Description Logics for Information Integration , 2002, Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond.

[12]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Contextualizing ontologies , 2004, J. Web Semant..

[13]  Steffen Staab,et al.  QOM - Quick Ontology Mapping , 2004, GI Jahrestagung.

[14]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Ontologies in Support of Problem Solving , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[15]  Pascal Hitzler,et al.  A Metamodel and UML Profile for Rule-Extended OWL DL Ontologies , 2006, ESWC.

[16]  Saartje Brockmans,et al.  A Metamodel and UML Profile for Networked Ontologies – The Complete Reference , 2006 .

[17]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003 , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching , 2002, Proceedings 18th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[19]  Boris Motik,et al.  A mapping system for the integration of OWL-DL ontologies , 2005, IHIS '05.

[20]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  A Formal Investigation of Mapping Language for Terminological Knowledge , 2005, IJCAI.

[21]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  A Framework for Ontology Integration , 2001, The Emerging Semantic Web.