Probing waveform synthesis and receive filter design for active sensing systems

Probing waveform synthesis and receive filter design play crucial roles in achievable performance for active sensing applications, including radar, sonar, and medical imaging. We focus herein on conventional single-input single-output (SISO) radar systems. A flexible receive filter design approach, at the costs of lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and higher computational complexity, can be used to compensate for missing features of the probing waveforms. A well synthesized waveform, meaning one with good autocorrelation properties, can reduce computational burden at the receiver and improve performance. Herein, we will highlight the interplay between waveform synthesis and receiver design. We will review a novel, cyclic approach to waveform design, and then compare the merit factors of these waveforms to other well-known sequences. In our comparisons, we will consider chirp, Frank, Golomb, and P4 sequences. Furthermore, we will overview several advanced techniques for receiver design, including data-independent instrumental variables (IV) filters, a data-adaptive iterative adaptive approach (IAA), and a data-adaptive Sparse Bayesian Learning (SBL) algorithm. We will show how these designs can significantly outperform conventional matched filter (MF) techniques for range compression as well as for range-Doppler imaging.

[1]  R. Turyn,et al.  On Barker codes of even length , 1963 .

[2]  Martin H. Ackroyd,et al.  Optimum Mismatched Filters for Sidelobe Suppression , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Jian Li,et al.  Iterative Adaptive Approaches to MIMO Radar Imaging , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[4]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Polyphase sequence with low autocorrelations , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Y. Selen,et al.  Model-order selection: a review of information criterion rules , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  Robert L. Frank,et al.  Polyphase codes with good nonperiodic correlation properties , 1963, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Tom Høholdt,et al.  The Merit Factor Problem for Binary Sequences , 2006, AAECC.

[8]  Jian Li,et al.  MIMO radar waveform synthesis , 2008, 2008 IEEE Radar Conference.

[9]  Steven Zoraster,et al.  Minimum Peak Range Sidelobe Filters for Binary Phase-Coded Waveforms , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevan e Ve tor Ma hine , 2001 .

[11]  Jonathan Jedwab,et al.  A Survey of the Merit Factor Problem for Binary Sequences , 2004, SETA.

[12]  Jian Li,et al.  Signal Synthesis and Receiver Design for MIMO Radar Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Jian Li,et al.  Compressed Sensing via Sparse Bayesian Learning and Gibbs Sampling , 2009, 2009 IEEE 13th Digital Signal Processing Workshop and 5th IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop.

[14]  Jian Li,et al.  Transmit codes and receive filters for pulse compression radar systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[15]  Shalom Eliahou,et al.  Barker sequences and difference sets , 1992 .

[16]  Jian Li,et al.  Waveform Synthesis for Diversity-Based Transmit Beampattern Design , 2007 .

[17]  Frank Kretschmer,et al.  Linear Frequency Modulation Derived Polyphase Pulse Compression Codes , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[18]  N. Levanon,et al.  Basic Radar Signals , 2004 .

[19]  K. Gerlach,et al.  Low sidelobe radar waveforms derived from orthogonal matrices , 1991 .

[20]  Hao He,et al.  New Algorithms for Designing Unimodular Sequences With Good Correlation Properties , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.