Attitudes toward Nuclear Energy

This study examined attitudes toward the building of a nuclear power station in one's locality. In a survey of 719 residents of four small rural communities that were selected as possible locations for a new nuclear power station in southwest England, we examined the effects of having lived near a nuclear power station on perceptions of the various possible consequences associated with this technology. Results showed a more favorable attitude in the community located near the existing nuclear power stations than in the three remaining communities. Experience of having lived near a nuclear power station affected not only respondents' perceptions of the various potential costs and benefits of the building and operation of a nuclear power station in one's locality, but also the importance respondents attached to the various consequences. Results indicated marked differences in perceptions of economic benefits and health and environmental risks. Furthermore, present findings suggest that psychological risks play a crucial role in local acceptance of a nuclear power station. Attitudinal differences were most closely related to anxiety factors, and the present research serves as a reminder of the importance of these factors in attitude formation for those most directly affected by the building and operation of a nuclear power station.

[1]  Joop van der Pligt,et al.  PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO NUCLEAR ENERGY: SALIENCE AND ANXIETY , 1985 .

[2]  T. J. Mattingly,et al.  Changing expectations: A longitudinal study of community attitudes toward a nuclear power plant , 1983, American journal of community psychology.

[3]  A. Baum,et al.  Emotional, behavioral, and physiological effects of chronic stress at Three Mile Island. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[4]  Joop van der Pligt,et al.  Attitudes to nuclear energy: beliefs, values and false consensus , 1982 .

[5]  W. L. Rankin,et al.  Nuclear power and the public: an update of collected survey research on nuclear power , 1981 .

[6]  C. H. Castore,et al.  Expectancy‐Value and Selective Exposure as Determinants of Attitudes Toward a Nuclear Power Plant1 , 1980 .

[7]  Gerald Berk,et al.  Public Opposition to Nuclear Energy: Retrospect and Prospect , 1980 .

[8]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Belief and Values in the Nuclear Debate1 , 1979 .

[9]  H. J. Otway,et al.  Nuclear power: The question of public acceptance , 1978 .

[10]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Community attitudes toward a proposed nuclear power generating facility as a function of expected outcomes , 1977 .

[11]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[12]  H. J. Otway,et al.  The Determinants of Attitude Formation: An Application to Nuclear Power , 1976 .

[13]  M. Fishbein.  An Investigation of the Relationships between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward that Object , 1963 .

[14]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[15]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Dimensional salience: judgment and attitudes , 1984 .

[16]  W. L. Rankin,et al.  Public opinion and nuclear energy , 1983 .

[17]  Leonard Bickman,et al.  Applied social psychology annual , 1980 .