Uso de revisiones sistemáticas como estrategia de generación de conocimientos para mejora continua

Resumen En el presente trabajo se describe como las Revisiones Sistemáticas (una estrategia científica que apunta a generar piezas de conocimiento de alto nivel) pueden ayudar al proceso de " mejora continua " que propone CMMI a las empresas que desean certificar los más altos niveles de madurez. conocimiento fiables que ayuden a la " mejora continua " que propone CMMI [Software Engineering Institute, 1995]. En el Estado del la Cuestión (sección 2) se describen los modelos de madurez de desarrollo de software (sección 2.1) y se describe en que consisten los distintos enfoques experimentales (sección 2.2); en la definición del problema (sección 3) se identifica el problema a

[1]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Investigating the Defect Detection Effectiveness and Cost Benefit of Nominal Inspection Teams , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[2]  Shinji Kusumoto,et al.  An experimental comparison of checklist-based reading and perspective-based reading for UML design document inspection , 2002, Proceedings International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering.

[3]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Investigating the accuracy of defect estimation models for individuals and teams based on inspection data , 2003, 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2003. ISESE 2003. Proceedings..

[4]  Filippo Lanubile,et al.  Investigating the active guidance factor in reading techniques for defect detection , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE '04..

[5]  Adam A. Porter,et al.  Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment , 1995, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[6]  Forrest Shull,et al.  The empirical investigation of Perspective-Based Reading , 1995, Empirical Software Engineering.

[7]  Anna Grimán Padua.  Proposal of a Review Process of Empirical Studies in Software Engineering , 2007 .

[8]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Usage-Based and Checklist-Based Reading , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[9]  Filippo Lanubile,et al.  Assessing the impact of active guidance for defect detection: a replicated experiment , 2004, 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings..

[10]  Giovanni Cantone,et al.  Comparing code reading techniques applied to object-oriented software frameworks with regard to effectiveness and defect detection rate , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE '04..

[11]  M. Forbes,et al.  Variable reporting and quantitative reviews: a comparison of three meta‐analytical techniques , 2003 .

[12]  Marc Roper,et al.  The Development and Evaluation of Three Diverse Techniques for Object-Oriented Code Inspection , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[13]  Enrique Fernández.  AGGREGATION PROCESS WITH MULTIPLE EVIDENCE LEVELS FOR EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING , 2007 .

[14]  Natalia Juristo Juzgado,et al.  Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation , 2010, Springer US.

[15]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[16]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Thomas Thelin,et al.  A case study of reading techniques in a software company , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE '04..

[18]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Empirical results from an experiment on value-based review (VBR) processes , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005..

[19]  S. B. Kiselev,et al.  The capability maturity model: guidelines for improving the software process , 1995 .

[20]  Mary Beth Chrissis,et al.  CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement , 2003 .

[21]  Marco Torchiano,et al.  Empirical studies in reverse engineering: state of the art and future trends , 2007, Empirical Software Engineering.

[22]  Stefan Biffl,et al.  Investigating the effect of expert ranking of use cases for design inspection , 2004, Proceedings. 30th Euromicro Conference, 2004..