Reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction in North Carolina emergency departments (RACE): study design.

[1]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  The pre-hospital electrocardiogram and time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 2000-2002: findings from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Achieving door-to-balloon times that meet quality guidelines: how do successful hospitals do it? , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Barbara T. Unger,et al.  Design of a standardized system for transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2005, American heart journal.

[4]  Jerod M. Loeb,et al.  Quality of Care in U.S. Hospitals as Reflected by Standardized Measures, 2002-2004 , 2005 .

[5]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Times to Treatment in Transfer Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3/4 Analysis , 2005, Circulation.

[6]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  C. Pozner,et al.  Implications of the mechanical (PCI) vs thrombolytic controversy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction on the organization of emergency medical services: the Boston EMS experience. , 2004, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[8]  P. Touboul,et al.  Impact of Time to Treatment on Mortality After Prehospital Fibrinolysis or Primary Angioplasty: Data From the CAPTIM Randomized Clinical Trial , 2003, Circulation.

[9]  Klaus Rasmussen,et al.  A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Boura,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .

[11]  F. Buckner.  Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). , 2002, ED management : the monthly update on emergency department management.

[12]  P. Touboul,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study , 2002, The Lancet.

[13]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[14]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1998, JAMA.

[15]  W. Weaver,et al.  The prehospital electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction: is its full potential being realized? National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. A four-state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1995, JAMA.

[17]  Paula Finn,et al.  American Heart Association--scientific sessions 2005. 13-16 November 2005, Dallas, TX, USA. , 2006, IDrugs : the investigational drugs journal.

[18]  E. Bonnefoy,et al.  Primary angioplasty vs. prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study☆ , 2003 .