Roles of aided communication: perspectives of adults who use AAC

Purpose. The study described here explores the perspectives of adults who use augmentative and alternative communication in relation to their use of aided communication. The aims were to describe the supports available to adults using aided communication, their views on the role(s) they assigned to aided communication within their total communication systems and the factors they identified as affecting their use of aided communication. Method. Eighteen adults with cerebral palsy who use aided communication were surveyed using questionnaire-based interviews exploring the range of services available to them and the relevance, importance and meaning they assigned to communication devices. Results. Overall, participants expressed positive views about aided communication. Although all identified many unaided modes of communication as being important, most participants ranked aided communication among their primary modes. Use of aided communication was reported to be influenced by communication partners, but also by device features, with major concerns about reliability emerging. Conclusions. Factors affecting the integration of aided communication are complex. For many adults, lack of key supports, including availability of communication partners restrict the contexts and extent to which aided communication is used. The comments from the participants highlight the need to develop services for adults who use aided communication.

[1]  B. Weiner,et al.  The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Living in the state of stuck : how assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities , 2005 .

[3]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[4]  M. Scherer The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  J. Jutai,et al.  A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs) , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[6]  S. Balandin,et al.  Adults with cerebral palsy: What’s happening? , 1997 .

[7]  Ella Inglebret,et al.  Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[8]  Ivana Marková,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: Demographic survey , 1995 .

[9]  M. Battaglia,et al.  An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment , 2006, Multiple sclerosis.

[10]  Helen Arvidson,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Handbook of Principles and Practices , 1997 .

[11]  H. McConachie,et al.  Outcome of recommendations for augmentative communication in children. , 1998, Child: care, health and development.

[12]  J. Blackman,et al.  Children with severe speech impairments: caregiver survey of AAC use , 1991 .

[13]  Rita L. Bailey,et al.  Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. , 2006, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[14]  E Moodie,et al.  Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. , 1997, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[15]  H. McConachie,et al.  Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. , 2001, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[16]  E Moodie,et al.  AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. , 1996, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[17]  Hugh Stewart,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.