Effects of Customer and Innovation Asset Configuration Strategies on Firm Performance

Both customer and innovation assets are important to firm performance. Prior research has mostly examined these assets at the firm level and has not distinguished between the effects of asset depth relative to competitors and asset breadth across different segments. Using configuration theory and the resource-based view of the firm, the authors propose that how these assets interact to influence performance depends on both depth and breadth because these features reflect whether the assets are likely to create and/or appropriate value when deployed. Empirical results from two studies—one using secondary data and another using primary data from a survey of senior managers—indicate that performance is highest when firms employ configurations using deep customer and broad innovation assets or deep innovation and broad customer assets. In contrast, firm performance variability decreases in the presence of deep–deep and broad–broad asset configurations. The effect of configuration strategies on firm performance also is typically greater in dynamic than in stable environments.

[1]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development , 1999 .

[2]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions , 2008 .

[3]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Truth in Marketing Theory and Research , 1990 .

[4]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[5]  Nermin Eyuboglu,et al.  The Performance Implications of Designing Multiple Channels to Fit with Strategy and Environment , 2007 .

[6]  Mandel Id,et al.  What will the future bring. , 1992 .

[7]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[9]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? , 2005 .

[10]  B. Silverman Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[11]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance , 2003 .

[12]  W. Sharpe,et al.  Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets , 1987 .

[13]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[14]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[15]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Product Innovations, Advertising and Stock Returns , 2009 .

[16]  Robert W. Palmatier Interfirm Relational Drivers of Customer Value , 2008 .

[17]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[18]  P. Danaher,et al.  Implementing a customer relationship strategy: The asymmetric impact of poor versus excellent execution , 2000 .

[19]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[20]  J. S. Evans STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY FOR HIGH TECHNOLOGY MANOEUVRES: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 1991 .

[21]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[22]  V. Rao,et al.  How is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of a Corporation? , 2004 .

[23]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[24]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[25]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[27]  Min Ding,et al.  Counting chickens before the eggs hatch: Associating new product development portfolios with shareholder expectations in the pharmaceutical sector , 2008 .

[28]  G. Day,et al.  Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[29]  S. Dutta,et al.  Success in High-Technology Markets: is Marketing Capability Critical? , 1999 .

[30]  Burton Egbert Stevenson,et al.  The home book of proverbs, maxims and familiar phrases , 1949 .

[31]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[32]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  The Value of Different Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Metrics in Predicting Business Performance , 2006 .

[33]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[34]  G. Tellis,et al.  The Value of Quality: Stock Market Returns to Published Quality Reviews , 2007 .

[35]  P. Williams Practice management. , 2005, The Alpha omegan.

[36]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[37]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[38]  R. Chandy,et al.  What Will the Future Bring? Dominance, Technology Expectations, and Radical Innovation , 2003 .

[39]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value , 2008 .

[40]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Richard Staelin,et al.  Identifying Generalizable Effects of Strategic Actions on Firm Performance: The Case of Demand-Side Returns to R&D Spending , 1995 .