Evolving In Step or Poles Apart?: Online Audiences and Networking During Poland and France 2011-12 Election Campaign

Comparative studies are rare in the study of online communication campaigning. The authors chose two cases, Poland and France, to describe the two campaigns for the Parliamentary elections. Content analysis allowed the authors to detect online communication strategies and parties' attempt to reach different audiences. Web-cartography illustrates the parties' network connections. The authors find strong cross-country and resource-based differences for the more interactive and engaging features (Web 2.0), which are not that powerful for explaining audience-targeting strategies. Overall a sales strategy and a focus on marketing dominated over e-representation (exhibiting the parties' political record). In both countries social media platforms are well incorporated into online strategies. Facebook dominates in Poland, Twitter in France. Web cartography gives a counterintuitive picture of the Polish parties' network being much more personalized but also of more ghettoing within the supporting environment.

[1]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  The Disconnection In Online Politics: the youth political web sphere and US election sites, 2002–2004 , 2007 .

[2]  P. Baranowski,et al.  Poland’s 2011 Online Election Campaign: New Tools, New Professionalism, New Ways to Win Votes , 2014 .

[3]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[4]  Padhraig Ryan,et al.  Paying for Performance: Key Design Features and the Bigger Picture , 2012 .

[5]  Michele H. Jackson.  Assessing the Structure of Communication on the World Wide Web , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  P. Norris.  Preaching to the Converted? , 2001 .

[7]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[8]  Richard W. Davis.  Making a Difference: A Comparative View of the Role of the Internet in Election Politics , 2008 .

[9]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Political participation and procedural utility: An empirical study , 2006 .

[10]  R. Gibson,et al.  Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning , 2015 .

[11]  A. Chadwick.  Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: Recent Shifts in the Relationship between the Internet and Democratic Engagement in Britain and the United States , 2012 .

[12]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  Online Electoral Competition in Different Settings , 2008 .

[13]  H. Schmitt,et al.  NINE SECOND‐ORDER NATIONAL ELECTIONS – A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN ELECTION RESULTS , 1980 .

[14]  P. Howard.  New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen , 2005 .

[15]  Cristian Vaccari.  Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study , 2013 .

[16]  P. Levy,et al.  Recruitment on the Net: How Do Organizational Web Site Characteristics Influence , 2004 .

[17]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Information-seeking and mediated searching. Part 1. Theoretical framework and research design , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Henry Jenkins.  Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture , 2006 .

[19]  Robert Ackland,et al.  A Relational Hyperlink Analysis of an Online Social Movement , 2011, J. Soc. Struct..

[20]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer.  Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning? , 2008 .

[21]  D. Lilleker,et al.  Elections 2.0: Comparing E-Campaigns in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States , 2011 .

[22]  P. Norris,et al.  Getting the Message Out: A Two-Step Model of the Role of the Internet in Campaign Communication Flows During the 2005 British General Election , 2008 .

[23]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[24]  F. Esser,et al.  Comparing Political Communication: Comparing Political Communication: Reorientations in a Changing World , 2004 .

[25]  Kajsa E. Dalrymple,et al.  Finally Informing the Electorate? How the Internet Got People Thinking about Presidential Politics in 2004 , 2007 .

[26]  Robert Rohrschneider,et al.  Mobilizing versus chasing: how do parties target voters in election campaigns? , 2002 .

[27]  Karolina Koc-Michalska,et al.  MEPs online: Understanding communication strategies for remote representatives , 2013 .

[28]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  Changing Campaign Communications: A Party-Centered Theory of Professionalized Campaigning , 2001 .

[29]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley.  On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It , 2000 .

[30]  Cristian Vaccari,et al.  Surfing to the Élysée: The Internet in the 2007 French Elections , 2008 .

[31]  Rasmus Kleis Nielsen,et al.  Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns , 2012 .

[32]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  The Internet in Campaigns and Elections , 2013 .

[33]  K. Erickson,et al.  Campaign Websites and Hypermedia Campaigning: Lessons from the Ed Balls Labour Leadership Campaign 2010 , 2012 .

[34]  R. Gibson,et al.  Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution , 2014 .

[35]  M. Merviö.  Contemporary Social Issues in East Asian Societies: Examining the Spectrum of Public and Private Spheres , 2014 .

[36]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Reaching Inward Not Outward: Marketing via the Internet at the UK 2010 General Election , 2013 .

[37]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer,et al.  Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning , 2011 .

[38]  David J. Samuels.  Presidentialized Parties , 2002 .

[39]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer.  Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in the national elections 2002–9 , 2011 .

[40]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning , 2013 .

[41]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Produsage , 2007, C&C '07.

[42]  Michael J. Jensen,et al.  Internet Use and Political Attitudes in Europe , 2012 .

[43]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[44]  D. Lilleker,et al.  Online Political Communication Strategies: MEPs, E-Representation, and Self-Representation , 2013 .

[45]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  A Proposed Methodology for Measuring the Function and Effectiveness of Political Web-Sites , 2000 .

[46]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Politics As Usual, or Politics Unusual? Position Taking and Dialogue on Campaign Websites in the 2002 U.S. Elections , 2005 .

[47]  Barbara Pfetsch,et al.  Comparing Political Communication: From Political Culture to Political Communications Culture: A Theoretical Approach to Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[48]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain , 2009 .

[49]  Costas Panagopoulos.  Politicking Online: The Transformation of Election Campaign Communications , 2009 .

[50]  Jennifer D. Greer and Mark E. LaPointe.  Cyber-campaigning grows up : A comparative content analysis of websites for US Senate and gubernatorial races, 1998–2000 , 2004 .

[51]  Cristian Vaccari,et al.  From the air to the ground: the internet in the 2004 US presidential campaign , 2008, New Media Soc..

[52]  Joyce L. D. Neys,et al.  Political Internet games: Engaging an audience , 2010 .

[53]  R. Gibson,et al.  Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK , 2003 .

[54]  Robert Ackland,et al.  Mapping Political Party Networks on the WWW , 2004 .

[55]  R. Gibson,et al.  A Proposed Methodology for Studying the Function and Effectiveness of Party and Candidate Web Sites , 2000 .

[56]  Martin Cave,et al.  Is Symmetric Access Regulation a Policy Choice? Evidence from the Deployment of NGA in Europe , 2015 .

[57]  K. Foot,et al.  The Internet and national elections : a comparative study of web campaigning , 2007 .

[58]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[59]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections: A cross-national comparative analysis , 2013, New Media Soc..

[60]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[61]  Lidia Noto,et al.  E-Government's Role in Shifting the Paradigm of Performance in the Public Sector , 2015, Open Government.